Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Divo Caro: Seller photo vs in-the-hand reality
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2506851, member: 19463"]A skill worth developing is reading photographs of coins. I see nothing deceptive in the images shown but just photos that show what a coin looks like in different light qualities and directions. This list regularly acts like a coin photo is required to match what one member will see when they look at the coin wherever it is that they look at coins. The problem is not all of us have the same lights and will not see the same thing with the same coin. Even wiggling a coin changes the waylight reflects from metal surfaces. Certainly you might call it deceptive to take a photo of a coin that shows it in its best light. I might say that big dealers that use black and white images of coins are being deceptive by hiding the color of the coin. Sallent's Postumus pair is a good example of the difference between light reflecting back into the camera and light grazing the surface highlighting texture. Both look like the coin. I believe it is up to each of us to learn the difference if we consider that difference important. I have shiny silver coins and matte black coins in my collection. One is not necessarily 'better' than the other. Dark coins do require a brighter light to enjoy than do light ones. I carry a small but bright light when I go to coin shows. It helps.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2506851, member: 19463"]A skill worth developing is reading photographs of coins. I see nothing deceptive in the images shown but just photos that show what a coin looks like in different light qualities and directions. This list regularly acts like a coin photo is required to match what one member will see when they look at the coin wherever it is that they look at coins. The problem is not all of us have the same lights and will not see the same thing with the same coin. Even wiggling a coin changes the waylight reflects from metal surfaces. Certainly you might call it deceptive to take a photo of a coin that shows it in its best light. I might say that big dealers that use black and white images of coins are being deceptive by hiding the color of the coin. Sallent's Postumus pair is a good example of the difference between light reflecting back into the camera and light grazing the surface highlighting texture. Both look like the coin. I believe it is up to each of us to learn the difference if we consider that difference important. I have shiny silver coins and matte black coins in my collection. One is not necessarily 'better' than the other. Dark coins do require a brighter light to enjoy than do light ones. I carry a small but bright light when I go to coin shows. It helps.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Divo Caro: Seller photo vs in-the-hand reality
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...