Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Dividing costs of aquisition in lots
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2646409, member: 56859"]I've bought several large lots over the last few years. Initially, I planned to assign specific relative values for purposes of record keeping.</p><p><br /></p><p>That never happened. It was just too much work and there wasn't much point in doing so. If I had purchased the lots hoping to sell some to defray the cost of the keepers, perhaps that exercise might have been more relevant. Then again, ultimately all that matters at the time of selling is the estimated current market value and what someone is willing to pay.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you really want to apportion cost of each coin in a group lot, the most accurate way would be to research current sales of each coin, estimate the current value for each, add all of the estimates together, use that total as the denominator for assigning a percent to each individual coin, and then multiply that fraction by the actual cost of the group lot to arrive at what you paid for each coin in the group.</p><p><br /></p><p>Like I said... too much work <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>As for Doug's recent group lot of Alexandrian coins from Commodus through the Severans, I will be forever envious. Same for the two group lots shown by Zumbly. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie100" alt=":wideyed:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The Commodus coins in Doug's group lot may seem grotty but for Commodus Alexandrians they're all actually pretty nice. Coin quality at Alexandria seems to be lacking during his reign. The same is true for Elagabalus. Here are a couple of yucky examples in my collection. Both need to be reshot as my photography has (arguably) improved since these were taken.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_1188f6a2536a4e998d42e81fdd45c083.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>EGYPT, Alexandria. Commodus</b></p><p>year 27, sole reign, CE 186/7</p><p>tetradrachm, 24.5 mm, 11.5 gm</p><p>Obv: MAKOMANTωCEBEVCEB; laureate head right</p><p>Rev: head of Zeus Ammon right; L K Z</p><p>Ref: Emmett 2568.27</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_dad41ceb66724ad383da624a6daae662.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>EGYPT, Alexandria. Elagabalus</b></p><p>year 5, CE 221/2</p><p>tetradrachm</p><p>Obv: AKAICAPMAAVPANTωNINOCEVCEB; laureate head right</p><p>Rev: head of Zeus Ammon right; L-E (most likely E; could be B, year 2)</p><p>Ref: Emmett 2961.5 (or .2, but most likely year 5)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2646409, member: 56859"]I've bought several large lots over the last few years. Initially, I planned to assign specific relative values for purposes of record keeping. That never happened. It was just too much work and there wasn't much point in doing so. If I had purchased the lots hoping to sell some to defray the cost of the keepers, perhaps that exercise might have been more relevant. Then again, ultimately all that matters at the time of selling is the estimated current market value and what someone is willing to pay. If you really want to apportion cost of each coin in a group lot, the most accurate way would be to research current sales of each coin, estimate the current value for each, add all of the estimates together, use that total as the denominator for assigning a percent to each individual coin, and then multiply that fraction by the actual cost of the group lot to arrive at what you paid for each coin in the group. Like I said... too much work :D As for Doug's recent group lot of Alexandrian coins from Commodus through the Severans, I will be forever envious. Same for the two group lots shown by Zumbly. :wideyed: The Commodus coins in Doug's group lot may seem grotty but for Commodus Alexandrians they're all actually pretty nice. Coin quality at Alexandria seems to be lacking during his reign. The same is true for Elagabalus. Here are a couple of yucky examples in my collection. Both need to be reshot as my photography has (arguably) improved since these were taken. [IMG]https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_1188f6a2536a4e998d42e81fdd45c083.jpg[/IMG] [B]EGYPT, Alexandria. Commodus[/B] year 27, sole reign, CE 186/7 tetradrachm, 24.5 mm, 11.5 gm Obv: MAKOMANTωCEBEVCEB; laureate head right Rev: head of Zeus Ammon right; L K Z Ref: Emmett 2568.27 [IMG]https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_dad41ceb66724ad383da624a6daae662.jpg[/IMG] [B]EGYPT, Alexandria. Elagabalus[/B] year 5, CE 221/2 tetradrachm Obv: AKAICAPMAAVPANTωNINOCEVCEB; laureate head right Rev: head of Zeus Ammon right; L-E (most likely E; could be B, year 2) Ref: Emmett 2961.5 (or .2, but most likely year 5)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Dividing costs of aquisition in lots
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...