Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BuffaloHunter, post: 3297051, member: 5821&quot;]In my opinion, this is exactly the way the TPG&#039;s should have went.&nbsp; Sorry, but a standard is a standard.&nbsp; I work with plenty of engineers from civil, mechanical, electrical, etc. and standards mean something - and are certainly not open to interpretation or ego driven opinions.&nbsp; The alphabet goes from A to Z where I come from - and that&#039;s a standard, too.&nbsp; I&#039;ll stick to the grading that I was brought up on and will follow the advice my uncle gave me thirty plus years ago - buy the coin you like, grade it and price it yourself.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I honestly don&#039;t know how any of this can be an argument.&nbsp; Doug has said it emphatically and many agree - wear is wear.&nbsp; I have a worn copy of Photograde (the buffalo pages are pretty beat up) that still does the trick for me.&nbsp; I am perfectly fine if they want to give it a green bean for exceptional toning or a purple unicorn (fictional) for fully split bands - but an AU coin is still an AU coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in