Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 8356464, member: 5372&quot;]I am curious why you would be offended, especially in light of other inappropriate posts, that you were not curious about. I was the person that questioned Insider about posting a &quot;defense&quot; of ICG and doing so in a very unclear manner. If you have a problem with my posts, or think I am out of line and doing so intentionally, PM me. I don&#039;t need to start anything. It is a thread. It is an interesting thread. If there is inappropriateness, it is Insider hijacking a thread to ad nauseum &#039;defend&#039; ICG and doing so because of his misinterpretation.</p><p><br /></p><p>Do you have an issue with the thread having a post that states a post has nothing to do with Mr. Carr&#039;s fantasy overstrikes, and then posts spending an altered genuine coin is OK, or with a post that meanders into what a definition of a novices is and snidely refers to members here in a condescending manner? You certainly can interpret intent of a post in any manner you wish, but you seem to be doing so selectively. If I have offended you because I question a possible board friend, you can place me on ignore, without the drama queen post. You do not know anything about me, what I do, or why I post.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is a discussion topic concerning Carr counterfeits. Maybe you are attempting to start something because for some reason, that you could not articulate if asked to do so, explain, except you take umbrage with the person. That is inappropriate. Your post? Silly, when you think about it, in light of other posts, here.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, I will answer your question, although I do not think it was asked in good faith, but to belittle, in my opinion:</p><p><br /></p><p>The reason is stated in my post. I consider the rants about the integrity of ICG on &#039;your post&#039; to have been inappropriate, and to do so because of his incorrect interpretation of events, yet the CAC Board I am referring to, and that Insider is a member of, has a member opining today concerning ICG grading, yet Insider does not reply. I consider his earlier comments on &#039;your post&#039; inappropriate. You maybe don&#039;t. Selective interpretation.&nbsp; So, why would you think it necessary to respond to me in a drama queen manner, when you do not respond to similarly inappropriate threads?</p><p><br /></p><p>The Moderators might find it in the interest of this thread to simply remove my posts. However, I do not consider any thread or post by a member, to somehow be inappropriate (outside stated rules) because you or anyone else thinks so. Membership is equality, regardless of perceived stature in the collecting numismatic hobby.</p><p><br /></p><p>Next time, simply PM me and we can discuss without all the drama, or pm me and aske me to remove a post if it offends you so much. There is another alternative available: ignore me.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have one more response to post on this thread, and I will then not reply to any thread you start.</p><p><br /></p><p>I hope this is acceptable to you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in