Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 8336224, member: 5372&quot;]That is disingenuous of you.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is not similar in any manner to what you previously stated. It certainly is not &#039;close enough&#039;. You are simply deliberately misdirecting the reader in an attempt to convince the audience you were (are)correct, via your previous post</p><p><br /></p><p>There was no settled Law. There was and is not any &quot;finding&quot;, save that the Defendant request for Dismissal was denied. The Proceeding ended in a Settlement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. There was no FTC vs. Anybody.</p><p><br /></p><p>What precise issue; that there is an HPA Law? What part of applicable HPA applies, then, as a matter of Law? Why exactly is a planchet immaterial? That does not make any sense at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>Your belief of what would occur if you proceeded to a proper venue is not in any manner to be confused with your prior statements, and if your attorney proceeded&nbsp; with your case on the basis of the Westminster &#039;finding&#039;, my advice would be Better Call Saul, since there was no &#039;finding&#039;, and no &#039;same reasons&#039; to plead to the the Court.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is not a matter of different beliefs, it is a matter of no precedent, to predict what the courts would or would not do. Of note, this was a District Court Proceeding. There would be a heck of a lot more steps to go, to reach your &#039;facts&#039;.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in