Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 8334876, member: 27832&quot;]For those who believe Carr is damaging the hobby: would you be equally as unhappy if someone started doing a <i>really really good</i> <i>job </i>of, say, attaching S mintmarks to 1964 Kennedy dollars? Modifying 2017-P Lincolns to make them 2011-P&#039;s? Would it be OK if they marketed them as a hobo-nickel-style project?</p><p><br /></p><p>One of the main arguments seems to be &quot;but what happens when they fall into the hands of an innocent neophyte collector who thinks he&#039;s found a Major Rarity&quot;? That&#039;s certainly a thing that can happen. Just look at the unending flow of new parking-lot finds in the Error Coins forum. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s grounds for prosecution or prohibition. (Well, if someone wants to use it as an argument for prohibiting the manufacture of Zincolns, I certainly won&#039;t stand in their way.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in