Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 8334866, member: 27832&quot;]I&#039;m having some difficulty finding &quot;Westminster Mint vs. FTC&quot;, but I found this discussion; is this what you had in mind?</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/924970/tomorrow-is-my-day-in-court-final-settlement-approved-by-court-my-muzzle-removed" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/924970/tomorrow-is-my-day-in-court-final-settlement-approved-by-court-my-muzzle-removed" rel="nofollow">https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/924970/tomorrow-is-my-day-in-court-final-settlement-approved-by-court-my-muzzle-removed</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Westminster Mint was striking items that resembled US coins <i>starting with silver blanks</i>, not overstriking legitimate coins. If Carr were striking his fantasy issues from raw metal, I think he would already have been shut down. He isn&#039;t, and he hasn&#039;t been.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think the &quot;overstriking on an existing coin of the same denomination&quot; gives him bulletproof protection from the &quot;attacking the money supply&quot; aspect of counterfeit prosecution. As for Hobby Protection? It&#039;s still a gray area, based on the amount of heat it continues to generate.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in