Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EWC3, post: 4398700, member: 93416&quot;]It was self evidently a joke about dogs, with a bit of historical background</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is an oxymoron Donna. It is an amusing joke to ask me to be “specific” about something as utterly vague as “conventional wisdom”.&nbsp; Just rhetoric.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you really did want to understand the facts and arguments in my positions (note: facts and arguments - not rhetoric) it would be a good plan to read my post and ask specific questions about what I say in them. Since you clearly imply you do not understand them and find them boring – please explain - why do you reply to them at all?&nbsp; Puzzling.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=74571]@Stevearino[/USER]&nbsp; - as I said, am puzzled by [USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER] ’s post – apparently commanding me to provide simple answers to complicated matters. But your own positions seems even weirder – since you wrote to me privately to say “I find this whole discussion extremely interesting. “ and then publicly ‘like’ an offensive post from a reader talking about “eyes glazing over” concerning them. Beyond weird.</p><p><br /></p><p>Rob T[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in