Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Discoveries of advanced pre-flood civiliztions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4311044, member: 93416"]Nope, that is why we have to check our ideas against the facts. Clinging to the skirts of the eminent may give a feeling of security or, if you aspire to a career, help you up the greasy pole. But swapping your own bias for a communal (and very often politically dictated) bias is a retrograde step.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I welcome criticism so hope they will try. I published plenty, so if signs of crankiness are there please point ‘em out.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Respect is due to facts and logic, persons have to earn it, and not just by putting on a fancy costume.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The idea that science cannot ever legitimately claim to have discovered a general truth seems to have been the normal position ever since Democritus, before 400 BC. Feyerabend was more interested in putting Voodoo on a par with science. Berkeley, Yale and LSE gave him professorships for it</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Prior to WWII most archaeology was done by passionate amateurs. Some was good, some not so, but there was no central misdirection going on. I agree there was a “positivist” phase after that in archaeology. It seems primarily to me to have been a push by a then rather small bunch of professional in a turf war with the amateurs - to get power over the subject. Adopting a kind of puritanical dismissal of theory altogether was a useful platform from which to scoff at all amateur efforts. I can point to a good study bearing on that if you wish. Then, as you say, once the professionals got control of the subject we had the kid-in-the-candy-shop over enthusiasm, every bit as bad as the worst sort of amateur theorising. So its just your “has now been largely corrected” bit I disagree with. To me it seems that critical rationalism has almost been stamped out these days. People generally seem blind to the gross errors that turn up way too often. Kings new clothes.</p><p><br /></p><p>Rob T[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4311044, member: 93416"]Nope, that is why we have to check our ideas against the facts. Clinging to the skirts of the eminent may give a feeling of security or, if you aspire to a career, help you up the greasy pole. But swapping your own bias for a communal (and very often politically dictated) bias is a retrograde step. I welcome criticism so hope they will try. I published plenty, so if signs of crankiness are there please point ‘em out. Respect is due to facts and logic, persons have to earn it, and not just by putting on a fancy costume. The idea that science cannot ever legitimately claim to have discovered a general truth seems to have been the normal position ever since Democritus, before 400 BC. Feyerabend was more interested in putting Voodoo on a par with science. Berkeley, Yale and LSE gave him professorships for it Prior to WWII most archaeology was done by passionate amateurs. Some was good, some not so, but there was no central misdirection going on. I agree there was a “positivist” phase after that in archaeology. It seems primarily to me to have been a push by a then rather small bunch of professional in a turf war with the amateurs - to get power over the subject. Adopting a kind of puritanical dismissal of theory altogether was a useful platform from which to scoff at all amateur efforts. I can point to a good study bearing on that if you wish. Then, as you say, once the professionals got control of the subject we had the kid-in-the-candy-shop over enthusiasm, every bit as bad as the worst sort of amateur theorising. So its just your “has now been largely corrected” bit I disagree with. To me it seems that critical rationalism has almost been stamped out these days. People generally seem blind to the gross errors that turn up way too often. Kings new clothes. Rob T[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Discoveries of advanced pre-flood civiliztions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...