Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2497628, member: 19463&quot;]It would be interesting to see the coins from which RIC described 167 and 168.&nbsp; I&#039;d probably accept the very vanilla 167 walking were it not for the much better 168 suggestion that he was more than just holding the t-bolt.&nbsp; I rather like the way this aureus was described but we have to remove the part about the giant:</p><p><a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=221253" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=221253" rel="nofollow">https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=221253</a></p><p>Fulgeratori means &#039;lightning bringer&#039; and the pose here clearly shows a lot more beyond &#039;holding&#039; so I would chalk this up to just one more example of why we really need a new RIC V edition that is not just a reprint of the current pathetic one.&nbsp; If there is any volume that strayed from &#039;user friendly&#039; it is V.&nbsp; Instead, we see all the efforts put into polishing of the popular RR and early empire material.&nbsp; Diocletian deserves better than this. </p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, I was trying to be good avoid asking if those numbers were ERIC.&nbsp; I failed.&nbsp; Put ERIC away and buy RIC if you really want RIC numbers.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in