Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Diocletian Antoninian with scarce reverse
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 8204294, member: 84905"]Thanks a lot!</p><p><br /></p><p>I found another example on acsearch, sold by Harlan J. Berk. Its condition is worse than mine, but it sold for USD 500 (some 10 times what I paid)!</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8554414" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8554414" rel="nofollow">https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8554414</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The Harlan J. Berk cataloger wrote:</p><p><br /></p><p>"<i>Though this interesting type was valued at only 4 francs by Cohen, was called "common" by RIC, and was priced very moderately by Sear-12673, it actually seems to be quite rare, since CoinArchives and the Berk photofile contain not a single specimen. Apart from ours, the only actual specimen we came across was in the Mazzini Collection, pl. LXXIII, 289. However according to Pink\'s Gerin Catalogue of 1921, p. 212, n?. 41, the Gerin Collection contained specimens from three different officinae, not only officina G like ours but also officinae B and ?....</i>"</p><p><br /></p><p>I don't think it is quite as rare as this entry suggest (3 pieces on Wildwinds), but it is certaintly scarce and mine is in the best condition of the four coins.</p><p><br /></p><p><u>The legend</u></p><p>The FVLGERATORI-legend is by far the rarest of the IOVI legends on Diocletian's coins. The most common being:</p><p> </p><p><b>IOVI CONSERVATORI</b> = Jupiter the preserver, and</p><p><b>IOVI TVTATORI </b>= Jupiter the guardian.</p><p><br /></p><p>The legend "<b>IOVI FVLGERATORI</b>" = "Jupiter the hurler of thunderbolds", does seem to be a bit of a departure from this theme. I think it was only used by Diocletian to mark his special connection to Jupiter and his cult. Besides the Antoniniani, the legend was also used on Aurei.</p><p> </p><p>I think the legend is a reference to the earliest Jupiter cult, which stressed the amospheric quality of Jupiter as <b>Jupiter Tonans</b> (Jupiter the thunderer). The depiction of IOVI FVLGERATORI on Diocletian's aurei includes a person surrounded by snakes as target of Jupiter's thunderbold. I suppose this person symbolizes evil, making Jupiter the vanquisher of evil.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6896845" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6896845" rel="nofollow">https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6896845</a></p><p><br /></p><p><u>The mint</u></p><p>It looks like the type was only minted at Rome, perhaps in conjunction with festivities at the most important of all Jupiter temples on the Capitoline Hill.</p><p><br /></p><p>Harlan J. Berk's example has the mintmark gamma (3rd officina). The Wildwind exemplars have A, B and gamma. I'm not entirely sure with the reading of the officina on my coin. It could be A or delta, I'm leaing towards delta now, after closer inspection.</p><p><br /></p><p><u>The date</u></p><p>The Harlan Berk coin was dated to 289. One of the Wildwind exemplar's was dated to 290. The aureus is dated to 287. So I suppose anywhere between 287 and 290 is possible. The dating is important. I first thought, that the Fulgeratori-series may by linked to the Jupiter temple at Diocletian's resedence in Split. But this temple was only built between 295 and 305.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 8204294, member: 84905"]Thanks a lot! I found another example on acsearch, sold by Harlan J. Berk. Its condition is worse than mine, but it sold for USD 500 (some 10 times what I paid)! [URL]https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8554414[/URL] The Harlan J. Berk cataloger wrote: "[I]Though this interesting type was valued at only 4 francs by Cohen, was called "common" by RIC, and was priced very moderately by Sear-12673, it actually seems to be quite rare, since CoinArchives and the Berk photofile contain not a single specimen. Apart from ours, the only actual specimen we came across was in the Mazzini Collection, pl. LXXIII, 289. However according to Pink\'s Gerin Catalogue of 1921, p. 212, n?. 41, the Gerin Collection contained specimens from three different officinae, not only officina G like ours but also officinae B and ?....[/I]" I don't think it is quite as rare as this entry suggest (3 pieces on Wildwinds), but it is certaintly scarce and mine is in the best condition of the four coins. [U]The legend[/U] The FVLGERATORI-legend is by far the rarest of the IOVI legends on Diocletian's coins. The most common being: [B]IOVI CONSERVATORI[/B] = Jupiter the preserver, and [B]IOVI TVTATORI [/B]= Jupiter the guardian. The legend "[B]IOVI FVLGERATORI[/B]" = "Jupiter the hurler of thunderbolds", does seem to be a bit of a departure from this theme. I think it was only used by Diocletian to mark his special connection to Jupiter and his cult. Besides the Antoniniani, the legend was also used on Aurei. I think the legend is a reference to the earliest Jupiter cult, which stressed the amospheric quality of Jupiter as [B]Jupiter Tonans[/B] (Jupiter the thunderer). The depiction of IOVI FVLGERATORI on Diocletian's aurei includes a person surrounded by snakes as target of Jupiter's thunderbold. I suppose this person symbolizes evil, making Jupiter the vanquisher of evil. [URL]https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6896845[/URL] [U]The mint[/U] It looks like the type was only minted at Rome, perhaps in conjunction with festivities at the most important of all Jupiter temples on the Capitoline Hill. Harlan J. Berk's example has the mintmark gamma (3rd officina). The Wildwind exemplars have A, B and gamma. I'm not entirely sure with the reading of the officina on my coin. It could be A or delta, I'm leaing towards delta now, after closer inspection. [U]The date[/U] The Harlan Berk coin was dated to 289. One of the Wildwind exemplar's was dated to 290. The aureus is dated to 287. So I suppose anywhere between 287 and 290 is possible. The dating is important. I first thought, that the Fulgeratori-series may by linked to the Jupiter temple at Diocletian's resedence in Split. But this temple was only built between 295 and 305.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Diocletian Antoninian with scarce reverse
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...