Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 987738, member: 19065&quot;]I put together a side-by-side comparison of the note under regular light and night vision mode as seen in the image below. What the night vision mode helped me see was more of the surface view of the questionable ink smear or gunk on the note and also that it had a general &#039;shape&#039;, that being more or less rectangular. Additionally, there are at least two distinct shapes that can be detected. Nonetheless, I still feel this occurred after printing and while the note was in circulation. </p><p><br /></p><p>The <b><span style="color: Red">red</span></b> area represents the strongest impression and has the more or less rectangular shape that runs off the margin of the note. The <span style="color: Orange"><b>yellow</b> </span>area represents what I would guess to be the second impression from the thing that came in contact with the note. The yellow shape is a little less defined, perhaps due to being the second and weaker impression or one in which most of the gunk transferred upon the first contact. I suspect that whatever the object was that came into contact with the note, may have been wet with something that acted as a chemical agent (even orange juice would likely be strong enough, but not plain water) to have loosened the ink at the moment of contact and caused the ink to smear. If ink smear is not the case (and I don&#039;t feel that it is) then the object simply had some tar-like gunk on it which transferred to the note. Just some thoughts/observations that I had and wanted to share after looking this over again.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i776.photobucket.com/albums/yy46/kcttck/World%20Currency%20-%20Canada/CN10_ikandiggit_gunk_on_note.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in