Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Digger's Diary: The Arcadius Anomaly (repost from one of my old Treasurenet threads)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lordmarcovan, post: 2590005, member: 10461"]I finally got around to submitting the copy in the OP to our local newspaper, <i>The Brunswick News</i>.</p><p><br /></p><p>The reporter botched some of the details about the coin itself and made the article more about <i>me</i> than the find, but hey, she did the best she could as a non-numismatist, and it got enough interest to be on Page 1 below the fold, so that's cool.</p><p><br /></p><p>At a company Christmas party yesterday, the CEO of the company my wife and I work for came up to me and obviously knew who I was, since he said he'd read about me in the paper. I mentioned that they'd misquoted a few things and he laughed and said, "Welcome to MY world!". So that was neat.</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p><i><b><a href="http://goldenisles.news/news/local_news/brunswick-resident-unearths-roman-coin-in-georgia/article_ff6e8176-8b0f-5d06-84d9-437ac607052c.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://goldenisles.news/news/local_news/brunswick-resident-unearths-roman-coin-in-georgia/article_ff6e8176-8b0f-5d06-84d9-437ac607052c.html" rel="nofollow">Brunswick Resident Unearths Roman Coin In Georgia</a></b></i></p><p>By Lindsey Adkison, <i>The Brunswick News, </i>Saturday, December 10, 2016.</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>OK, so she flubbed the math (though I might've been the one who inadvertently said "1700 years old" instead of "1600" during our phone conversation), they omitted the photo, she had me determining <i>"that it was a 1/4 penny"</i> (sic), though I merely said it might have circulated <i>as a substitute for</i> a farthing in colonial times- <i>not</i> that it <i>is</i> a farthing (that distinction will be lost on 95% of the general public, including our reporter), and worse, said I <i>"started digging"</i>, which I most certainly did NOT, next to a colonial cemetery! (This was a surface find that had been washed out by the rain.) Also, all mention of the emperor Arcadius was lost, making this article pretty nonsensical, in the numismatic sense.</p><p><br /></p><p>But she tried. Give her a C or a C+ for getting <i>most</i> of the facts straight. You can compare the article to my copy above to see what got garbled.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lordmarcovan, post: 2590005, member: 10461"]I finally got around to submitting the copy in the OP to our local newspaper, [I]The Brunswick News[/I]. The reporter botched some of the details about the coin itself and made the article more about [I]me[/I] than the find, but hey, she did the best she could as a non-numismatist, and it got enough interest to be on Page 1 below the fold, so that's cool. At a company Christmas party yesterday, the CEO of the company my wife and I work for came up to me and obviously knew who I was, since he said he'd read about me in the paper. I mentioned that they'd misquoted a few things and he laughed and said, "Welcome to MY world!". So that was neat. [INDENT][I][B][URL='http://goldenisles.news/news/local_news/brunswick-resident-unearths-roman-coin-in-georgia/article_ff6e8176-8b0f-5d06-84d9-437ac607052c.html']Brunswick Resident Unearths Roman Coin In Georgia[/URL][/B][/I] By Lindsey Adkison, [I]The Brunswick News, [/I]Saturday, December 10, 2016.[/INDENT] OK, so she flubbed the math (though I might've been the one who inadvertently said "1700 years old" instead of "1600" during our phone conversation), they omitted the photo, she had me determining [I]"that it was a 1/4 penny"[/I] (sic), though I merely said it might have circulated [I]as a substitute for[/I] a farthing in colonial times- [I]not[/I] that it [I]is[/I] a farthing (that distinction will be lost on 95% of the general public, including our reporter), and worse, said I [I]"started digging"[/I], which I most certainly did NOT, next to a colonial cemetery! (This was a surface find that had been washed out by the rain.) Also, all mention of the emperor Arcadius was lost, making this article pretty nonsensical, in the numismatic sense. But she tried. Give her a C or a C+ for getting [I]most[/I] of the facts straight. You can compare the article to my copy above to see what got garbled.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Digger's Diary: The Arcadius Anomaly (repost from one of my old Treasurenet threads)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...