Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Difficulties in the modern mint sets
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 14118, member: 68"]The '69 mint set is my favorite so I have to comment.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coins are all rarely very nice in this set. The Denver dime isn't extremely tough and the Denver quarter is a little tougher but finding superb gems of these coins was very difficult the day they left the mint. In the original sets up to 4% of the D dimes were very choice and about 3% of the quarters. The half was close behind. These sets were everywhere and they could be purchased for less than face value because no one wanted them. Over the years the number of sets and their contents have simply been decimated. Most of these sets are cut up and gone forever with the coins often just put into circulation. The sets that remain are usually damaged by tarnish and corrosion. </p><p><br /></p><p>This set contains what is perhaps the most underrated of all moderns; the Philly quarter. Most of these in the sets are abysmal. Only about 5% of the remaining coins can even be considered choice unc. Most modern collectors consider this the mimimum collectible grade and there are very few of these still available now days. These sets are not going to yield up very many more gems simply because there are too few left. This is a BU roll which for practical purposes doesn't exist. I've been looking for rolls since 1972 and have never seen one intact. About ten years ago I ran into one that had been split open and was being used to make change in a coin shop. The dealer sold me the balance of it. He knew the roll had a premium but said he had no customers for such things. The coins I saw back in 1969 were almost always very poorly made and it is very difficult to find one of these in circulation without extreme wear. </p><p><br /></p><p>Even when the '69 sets left the mint only about one in 300 was really gem quality. The biggest problem with these was that the marking on the planchets was not obliterated by the strike. Even gems tend to be rougher than other dates. The Denver quarter appears sometimes with a very silky luster and will sometimes be PL. This coin tends to have strike weakness in many cases, but the gems aren't rare. It also is very tough to find in rolls but is seen on rare occasion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 14118, member: 68"]The '69 mint set is my favorite so I have to comment. The coins are all rarely very nice in this set. The Denver dime isn't extremely tough and the Denver quarter is a little tougher but finding superb gems of these coins was very difficult the day they left the mint. In the original sets up to 4% of the D dimes were very choice and about 3% of the quarters. The half was close behind. These sets were everywhere and they could be purchased for less than face value because no one wanted them. Over the years the number of sets and their contents have simply been decimated. Most of these sets are cut up and gone forever with the coins often just put into circulation. The sets that remain are usually damaged by tarnish and corrosion. This set contains what is perhaps the most underrated of all moderns; the Philly quarter. Most of these in the sets are abysmal. Only about 5% of the remaining coins can even be considered choice unc. Most modern collectors consider this the mimimum collectible grade and there are very few of these still available now days. These sets are not going to yield up very many more gems simply because there are too few left. This is a BU roll which for practical purposes doesn't exist. I've been looking for rolls since 1972 and have never seen one intact. About ten years ago I ran into one that had been split open and was being used to make change in a coin shop. The dealer sold me the balance of it. He knew the roll had a premium but said he had no customers for such things. The coins I saw back in 1969 were almost always very poorly made and it is very difficult to find one of these in circulation without extreme wear. Even when the '69 sets left the mint only about one in 300 was really gem quality. The biggest problem with these was that the marking on the planchets was not obliterated by the strike. Even gems tend to be rougher than other dates. The Denver quarter appears sometimes with a very silky luster and will sometimes be PL. This coin tends to have strike weakness in many cases, but the gems aren't rare. It also is very tough to find in rolls but is seen on rare occasion.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Difficulties in the modern mint sets
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...