Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 4864175, member: 105098&quot;]No idea what your grading company is, but there is a repunched mint mark, and there is a doubled die obverse. </p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t&nbsp; know of any company calling and certifying either scenario as &quot;Double S Mint Mark&quot;.... Sounds like they don&#039;t know what they are doing to me.</p><p>for the doubled die obverse below is it depending on the cataloging system used:</p><p>Fivaz Stanton Numbers: Old FS-1-028&nbsp;&nbsp; New FS-01-1969S-101</p><p>Breen:&nbsp; 2252</p><p>Coneca:&nbsp; 1-O-I</p><p>Crawford: CDDO-001</p><p>Wexler: WDDO-001</p><p>Coppercoins:&nbsp; 1969S-1DO-001</p><p><br /></p><p>As far as the RPM theres a few different ones, but no legitimate TPG company would certify an RPM as &quot;double S Mint Mark&quot;</p><p><a href="http://www.varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/RPMs%201969S.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/RPMs%201969S.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.varietyvista.com/02b LC RPMs Vol 2/RPMs 1969S.htm</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in