Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2054203, member: 28107&quot;]The coins speak quite clearly for themselves, and the pieces do not support the claims that you are making (much like raised lines on 1936-1942 proofs that were discussed ad nauseam in another thread but that&#039;s another story).&nbsp; There are a substantial number of pre-1973 cameo pieces, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s.&nbsp; And ironically, a good number of these pieces exhibit the repolish effect that Physics and others are mentioning.&nbsp; I find it hard to believe that anyone could believe that all of this is coincidental.&nbsp; Your statements about not producing a large number of cameos is true for the 1936-1942 period, but by the early 1950s, a significant number of cameo pieces were produced (and certainly many more than for the 1936-1942 period - look at half dollars alone in which only 17 designated coins exist between PCGS and NGC for Half Dollars - compare even the rarest Franklin cameo date and you will see a huge disparity.).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in