Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
die marriages
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="quarter-back, post: 1680508, member: 47022"]OK. I'm just going to jump right in. I'm new, so be kind. I have been studying Dr. Wile's Washington quarter book intensively and have a couple of questions maybe some of you can answer. I can understand attaching a specific Die Marriage Registry number to a coin that can be traced to specific obverse and reverse dies. Where I get confused is the assigning of a DMR number to a pairing of obverse and reverse dies that are not unique. For example, as near as I can tell, DMR-1 for each series is the typical obverse and the typical reverse dies although typical may represent any one of a number of dies from the same hub, or even master die. Should I assume that this number represents Master dies rather than working dies. My second question is in regard to die with evidence of retouching. Would not the extent and exact pattern of retouching be enough to identify a die? I have a 1934d quarter that has the small D reverse and an unretouched obverse and one that has a retouched obverse. Yet both are assigned the same DMR. If anyone can clear up my misconceptions, I would appreciate it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="quarter-back, post: 1680508, member: 47022"]OK. I'm just going to jump right in. I'm new, so be kind. I have been studying Dr. Wile's Washington quarter book intensively and have a couple of questions maybe some of you can answer. I can understand attaching a specific Die Marriage Registry number to a coin that can be traced to specific obverse and reverse dies. Where I get confused is the assigning of a DMR number to a pairing of obverse and reverse dies that are not unique. For example, as near as I can tell, DMR-1 for each series is the typical obverse and the typical reverse dies although typical may represent any one of a number of dies from the same hub, or even master die. Should I assume that this number represents Master dies rather than working dies. My second question is in regard to die with evidence of retouching. Would not the extent and exact pattern of retouching be enough to identify a die? I have a 1934d quarter that has the small D reverse and an unretouched obverse and one that has a retouched obverse. Yet both are assigned the same DMR. If anyone can clear up my misconceptions, I would appreciate it. Thanks[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
die marriages
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...