Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;usmc60, post: 2526380, member: 76739&quot;]Dave to make everyone happy. Though I may not agree with it. Proper term is</p><p>delamination</p><p>Metal missing or retained but peeling from the surface due to incomplete bonding or impurities in the planchet.</p><p>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia </p><p>Dave as you can plainly see in your own photo if you were to peel the contaminated area back you would see the metal becomes a solid piece of brass. And this is my own opinion since the old planchet&#039;s were made out of one piece of metal and not layered like current coins. And nowhere was lamination involved in the making of this planchet. I&#039;ll refer to it just as it is a defect in the planchet material. Causing the molecules to separate. During the rolling process.It still is what it is a defect in the metal.And just like your quote.A lamination is material manufactured in layers.<b>deliberate</b>.Or not. Again Dave just because your coin shows a missing piece of brass. And since it was not manufactured in layers even though your coin shows where the molecules did not bined to gather in the rolling process it seems like due to contaminants caused a separation in material. To me it is a defective planchet. No more. Since lamination was not involved I cannot honestly agree with lamination in terms of the error.Now this coin Dave I have no problem in agreeing with a lamination error because as we all know this coin was put together in layers, and this planchet definitely has some&nbsp; problems. This process also occurred in the rolling process of the lamination between layers of metal. Keyword lamination the combining of metals. Big difference in a molecule separation due to contaminants in the metal. But I guess it&#039;s just easier to say lamination problem. And we all should throw party and be happy with that term. It is incorrect term for your coin. But I guess it&#039;s just easier to say it that way.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie6" alt=":cool:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie24" alt=":blackalien:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />PS.Dave I&#039;m not the only one that has a problem with this definition. As brought up to me on several occasions, how can a solid piece of brass have a lamination problem. Because they are thinking lamination is combining material together. Which is absolutely true. Then you tried to explain to them how gases and debris can cause a solid piece of metal to separate. They still want to know how it&#039;s involved in lamination.Maybe I&#039;m just like them and want to know where the word lamination came in. Since nothing was laminated.? All I can tell them is that&#039;s what the good book says.[ATTACH=full]539315[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in