Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Did They Send the Right Coin ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="philologus_1, post: 4369411, member: 92212"]I'd click 100 "Likes" if I could! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>There is benefit to a dealer having their customers open a coin envelope to see a newly purchased coin for the first time, and have the customer experience that wonderful feeling of, "Wow! This coin is better in hand!" That results in pleased customers, which leads to repeat customers -- and fewer returns. But the other side of that is that, presuming the coin was truly nicer in hand than the image showed, if the coin's image had been closer to what the coin really looked like it may have sold more quickly. Or possibly with less of a discount requested/granted. In that same vein, auction listings may very well receive more bidding if the the images looked as nice as the coin actually is.</p><p><br /></p><p>For the coin photographs that I take for myself (and for when I occasionally list on eBay), my goal is to make the image look as much like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" as possible. That includes details, surface, AND coloration of patina. I'm not naive in this regard though. Having taken a boatload of coin pictures I'm fully aware that the effort to make the photograph of a coin look close to 100% of what the coin actually looks like "in hand" takes far more time than dealers (and auction house photographers) can devote to the task. Doing so just isn't economically feasible. And so, we certainly should cut them slack. They need to stay solvent, and lets face it... we need <u>them</u>! After all, do they not supply our quasi-addiction? ;-)</p><p><br /></p><p>Big caveat here: I think that aiming for a coin's image to look 100% like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" is a good goal. But not 120%, if you know what I mean. Anything done to make any aspect of a coin look <b>better</b> than what the coin actually looks like "in hand" should be discourteously frowned upon. Lastly, I should add that aiming for a coin's image to look 100% like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" is as much of a good goal when a coin is Extra-Fine as it is when a coin is Extra-Ugly. :-o Let your coin photographs put the coin's accurate foot forward.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="philologus_1, post: 4369411, member: 92212"]I'd click 100 "Likes" if I could! :) There is benefit to a dealer having their customers open a coin envelope to see a newly purchased coin for the first time, and have the customer experience that wonderful feeling of, "Wow! This coin is better in hand!" That results in pleased customers, which leads to repeat customers -- and fewer returns. But the other side of that is that, presuming the coin was truly nicer in hand than the image showed, if the coin's image had been closer to what the coin really looked like it may have sold more quickly. Or possibly with less of a discount requested/granted. In that same vein, auction listings may very well receive more bidding if the the images looked as nice as the coin actually is. For the coin photographs that I take for myself (and for when I occasionally list on eBay), my goal is to make the image look as much like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" as possible. That includes details, surface, AND coloration of patina. I'm not naive in this regard though. Having taken a boatload of coin pictures I'm fully aware that the effort to make the photograph of a coin look close to 100% of what the coin actually looks like "in hand" takes far more time than dealers (and auction house photographers) can devote to the task. Doing so just isn't economically feasible. And so, we certainly should cut them slack. They need to stay solvent, and lets face it... we need [U]them[/U]! After all, do they not supply our quasi-addiction? ;-) Big caveat here: I think that aiming for a coin's image to look 100% like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" is a good goal. But not 120%, if you know what I mean. Anything done to make any aspect of a coin look [B]better[/B] than what the coin actually looks like "in hand" should be discourteously frowned upon. Lastly, I should add that aiming for a coin's image to look 100% like what the coin actually looks like "in hand" is as much of a good goal when a coin is Extra-Fine as it is when a coin is Extra-Ugly. :-o Let your coin photographs put the coin's accurate foot forward.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Did They Send the Right Coin ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...