Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Did My Gamble Pay Off?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="David Atherton, post: 8178381, member: 82616"]This mysterious Domitian dupondius came up for sale on Vcoins recently advertised as a 'mule'. Being a specialist I couldn't resist!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1429518[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Domitian Mule(?)</b></p><p>Æ Dupondius, 9.10g</p><p>Rome mint, 85 AD</p><p>Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XI CENS PER P P; Head of Domitian, radiate, r., with aegis</p><p>Rev: MONETA AVGVST; S C in field; Moneta stg. l., with scales and cornucopiae</p><p>RIC -. BMC -. BNC -.</p><p>Acquired from Ken Dorney, January 2022.</p><p><br /></p><p>An oddity for sure. Here we have a dupondius obverse paired with a Moneta reverse type which was an exclusive reverse to the As issues. I wrote to Ian Carradice co-author of RIC II.1 for his opinion. He writes - "I'm not sure about this coin. An official mint mule is certainly not out of the question, though it's a pity the end of the reverse inscription ..POT.. or ..PER.. is unclear, so I'm not sure which issue it would belong to? But also, I'm not sure if it really is official. The obverse has a good enough style, but the missing portion of the inscription suggests a large cut in that part of the die. Meanwhile, the reverse has a rather clumsily executed Moneta, with bizarre drapery (contrasting with the usually excellent style of AD 85). The reverse legend is also incomplete, so would render it difficult to catalogue (and that would be futile if it is 'barbarous').</p><p>The coin is certainly a curiosity, but that is about all I can say for it."</p><p><br /></p><p>Now with the piece in hand I can confirm the obverse reading as 'PER', putting the reverse reading as AVGVST and placing this coin in the third issue of 85. Both the obverse and reverse styles look official to my eyes. However, the low weight does give me pause. The metal appears to be orichalcum.</p><p><br /></p><p>Until another specimen surfaces with clearer legends I'll catalogue this as a possible mule. A curiosity indeed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Did my gamble to acquire a unique official mint mule pay off?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="David Atherton, post: 8178381, member: 82616"]This mysterious Domitian dupondius came up for sale on Vcoins recently advertised as a 'mule'. Being a specialist I couldn't resist! [ATTACH=full]1429518[/ATTACH] [B]Domitian Mule(?)[/B] Æ Dupondius, 9.10g Rome mint, 85 AD Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XI CENS PER P P; Head of Domitian, radiate, r., with aegis Rev: MONETA AVGVST; S C in field; Moneta stg. l., with scales and cornucopiae RIC -. BMC -. BNC -. Acquired from Ken Dorney, January 2022. An oddity for sure. Here we have a dupondius obverse paired with a Moneta reverse type which was an exclusive reverse to the As issues. I wrote to Ian Carradice co-author of RIC II.1 for his opinion. He writes - "I'm not sure about this coin. An official mint mule is certainly not out of the question, though it's a pity the end of the reverse inscription ..POT.. or ..PER.. is unclear, so I'm not sure which issue it would belong to? But also, I'm not sure if it really is official. The obverse has a good enough style, but the missing portion of the inscription suggests a large cut in that part of the die. Meanwhile, the reverse has a rather clumsily executed Moneta, with bizarre drapery (contrasting with the usually excellent style of AD 85). The reverse legend is also incomplete, so would render it difficult to catalogue (and that would be futile if it is 'barbarous'). The coin is certainly a curiosity, but that is about all I can say for it." Now with the piece in hand I can confirm the obverse reading as 'PER', putting the reverse reading as AVGVST and placing this coin in the third issue of 85. Both the obverse and reverse styles look official to my eyes. However, the low weight does give me pause. The metal appears to be orichalcum. Until another specimen surfaces with clearer legends I'll catalogue this as a possible mule. A curiosity indeed. Did my gamble to acquire a unique official mint mule pay off?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Did My Gamble Pay Off?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...