I don't see it. This is one of those errors? anomalies? pareidolia? or varieties?....that needs some arrows and circles to find. @furryfrog02- I gotta save that one!!!
Why are you waiting for a confirmation from @paddyman98 ? He has stated on more than one occasion that he doesn't care for or look for doubled dies. He specializes in errors which is a totally different animal. ~ Chris
I hate to say this, but you're falling into the same trap that a lot of inexperienced variety collectors fall into. More photos are not going to change anything! ~ Chris
He posted more pictures because I asked him to. And yes, when looking for varieties, more pictures at different angles very well could change things. In this case, it confirmed in my opinion that its machine doubling. I think bluntflame did very well in this thread - he posted a question, took answers, provided information, and then accepted our opinion. No need to jump on him.
Jason, I wasn't jumping on him. I merely used bold print to stress the point. Are you developing a thin skin? The conclusion that it was machine doubling and not a DDO had already been suggested. I posted the previous comment before I read yours. Just bad timing! ~ Chris