Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Eduard, post: 2553106, member: 8959&quot;]In my opinion it is a genuine example of RIC 219. It has that undefinable &#039;look&#039; of genuine to it. I am certainly not an expert&nbsp; either, but I have been collecting roman coin since 1989, so I guess I have seen a thing or two...<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Congratulations on that rare coin! As you say, RIC 211 is much more common.</p><p>I did see a total of 6 examples of RIC 219 listed on acsearch. You have to search for <b>Diadumenian</b> instead of Diadumenianus. This will yield you more hits, but it is <b>still a very scarce coin, for sure.</b></p><p><b></b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in