Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Diadem Distinction Doubt--Jovian Double Maiorina
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 7600191, member: 44316"]Here is my page on AE coins of Jovian:</p><p><a href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html" rel="nofollow">http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html</a></p><p>I don't claim to know about the fine distinction we are trying to make, but I can see some difference in diadems.</p><p>The third one down on that page (first coin below) has a diadem that is "laurel and rosette." Here it is:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1308700[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The first two lack the "rosette" part.</p><p>Here they are:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1308701[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1308702[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Jovian minted AE with only four reverse legends. Take a look:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html" rel="nofollow">http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I'd say the first coin and the OP coin are "laurel and rosette". The Antioch coin two posts above has obvious rosettes but only dots between them, not extended laurel leaves. Maybe that is what is meant by "rosette" alone. However, my top coin from Thessalonica does not have full leaves either, but dashes a bit longer than dots. Is there a continuum here being artificially divided into three? I see two [Edit: That is, rosette or not, separate from the pearl-diadem type, #3 in this post].[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 7600191, member: 44316"]Here is my page on AE coins of Jovian: [URL]http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html[/URL] I don't claim to know about the fine distinction we are trying to make, but I can see some difference in diadems. The third one down on that page (first coin below) has a diadem that is "laurel and rosette." Here it is: [ATTACH=full]1308700[/ATTACH] The first two lack the "rosette" part. Here they are: [ATTACH=full]1308701[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1308702[/ATTACH] Jovian minted AE with only four reverse legends. Take a look: [URL]http://augustuscoins.com/ed/Jovian/Jovian.html[/URL] I'd say the first coin and the OP coin are "laurel and rosette". The Antioch coin two posts above has obvious rosettes but only dots between them, not extended laurel leaves. Maybe that is what is meant by "rosette" alone. However, my top coin from Thessalonica does not have full leaves either, but dashes a bit longer than dots. Is there a continuum here being artificially divided into three? I see two [Edit: That is, rosette or not, separate from the pearl-diadem type, #3 in this post].[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Diadem Distinction Doubt--Jovian Double Maiorina
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...