Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Vess1, post: 3493393, member: 13650&quot;]That was a great post Doug.&nbsp; I didn&#039;t even know the websites allowed you to go back in time to study population numbers.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; One could argue that it may have taken some time for the TPGs to catch on.&nbsp;&nbsp; I mean, it probably took till the early to mid 2000s for most homes to even have internet.&nbsp;&nbsp; Much more information began being exchanged after the internet became common place in households so maybe it could account for a surge of submissions in the 2000s.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;d probably argue more than re-submits.&nbsp; Regardless, can&#039;t argue that there&#039;s surely many re-submits in their population numbers.&nbsp;&nbsp; For high value examples they may be re-submitted many, many times.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; For the $1k or less examples, I&#039;d think unless it came under new ownership, it wouldn&#039;t be cost effective to submit them too many times without the failures cutting into the profit to where it wasn&#039;t worth the hassle.&nbsp;&nbsp; IME and others, it seems they are pretty consistent on re-grades.&nbsp;&nbsp; While were speculating you could speculate the lower end ones are probably closer to their actual populations than the ones near the large price jump grades.&nbsp; And you can probably assume that most of the ones that are at a major price jump level, if it levels out some, are probably close to actual numbers as it gets more difficult to achieve a higher grade.&nbsp;&nbsp; This coin has so many price jumps, my theory doesn&#039;t work well for it.&nbsp; XF to AU50 is a major price jump but theres only like 400 pop in xf and 200 some in AU50.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in