Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Robert Scheschuk, post: 2336284, member: 74263&quot;]Hello, Rob here <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />).</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin was not submitted until <u>AFTER</u> the article was written by Mike Diamond</p><p><br /></p><p>First I submitted 5 coins to <b>NGC</b> and included the Article.&nbsp; after getting the coins back as &#039;defective reverse die&#039;, I called and asked about what research they do......&nbsp; They basically said, if it&#039;s not in the Whitman Books, they will do nothing more.</p><p><br /></p><p>I then submitted coins to <b>ICG</b> with all the same as my first submission.&nbsp; Coins came back as &#039;defective reverse die&#039;...... I then gave a call to ICG to as about what research they do.&nbsp; I spoke with &#039;Skip&#039; and we discussed something that could be done!&nbsp; (ICG has been extremely helpful in all ways).&nbsp; I handed over another set of coins right before a FUN convention.&nbsp; &#039;Skip&#039; then started with major footwork sharing and discussing with other specialist/expert/enthusiasts.</p><p>-----During this time I sent another set of 5 to <b>ANACS</b>.&nbsp; Article.&nbsp; These coins came back as &quot;Distorted Reverse Die &#039;Design Creep&#039;&quot;.&nbsp; Done and done; I wonder about ANACS quality?-----</p><p>Soooo...... After months I get a call back from &#039;Skip&#039;.&nbsp; A bump was reached when contacting mint on more information; still unknown. . ...?&nbsp; Anyway, &#039;Skip&#039; had said they would put the &#039;appropriate&#039; label o f &#039;Design Creep&#039; on these from now on. ...</p><p><br /></p><p>There you have the short version.&nbsp; Sorry for poor writing, that&#039;s how it is. ;P[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in