Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius vs Greek Provincial Drachm
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24648194, member: 26430"]That's a good point. I believe that was the idea, although I'd want to follow up on some references to check or get confirmation from someone who really knows the Provincial coins of this period.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><font size="6">SACRIFICES!</font></b></p><p><br /></p><p>I don't restrict myself to any particular denomination, and "12 Caesars" isn't that high on my priorities to collect (but it is on the list), so my own set includes some "sacrifices."</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Claudius in <b>Provincial </b>bronze!</b> <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=622873" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=622873" rel="nofollow">BCD Peloponnesos 2782</a>:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1569111[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Caligula (probably) on Reverse.</b> My Caligula doesn't even have a Caligula portrait on the obverse, just him (probably) sitting on the curule! <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3835735" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3835735" rel="nofollow">Ex ANS - HSA 1001.1.22981 (Huntington)</a>:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1569112[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Otho & Titus Denarii -- Mostly!</b> Returning to the theme of 12 Caesar's Denarii, my Titus and my Otho have made some significant sacrifices for science. Both ex-Muona Coll., and Butcher & Ponting's <i>Metallurgy </i>studies (see <a href="https://issuu.com/hjb-ancientcoins/docs/hjb_s_212th_buy_or_bid_sale" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://issuu.com/hjb-ancientcoins/docs/hjb_s_212th_buy_or_bid_sale" rel="nofollow">HJB BBS 212</a>, 511 for a much larger group of them, originally incl. these two):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1569114[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1569113[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>A (time of) Galba Provincial AE ... or Maybe Not at All?</b> My Galba, below, is probably the biggest sacrifice with respect to the goal of 12 Caesars coinage! (Never was a portrait at all, just a Persephone/Warrior <i>temp.</i> Galba.) I collect coins that have somehow been part of the numismatic literature and I also like Countermarks and Provincials; it fits all of those. RPC has its doubts about this specimen's identification but I think BCD was right: struck & countermarked during the reign of Galba in Lokri Opuntii (BCD Lokris-Phokis 157.5 = <a href="https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/1/1342" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/1/1342" rel="nofollow">RPC I Online 1342 example 14</a>):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1569115[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24648194, member: 26430"]That's a good point. I believe that was the idea, although I'd want to follow up on some references to check or get confirmation from someone who really knows the Provincial coins of this period. [B][SIZE=6]SACRIFICES![/SIZE][/B] I don't restrict myself to any particular denomination, and "12 Caesars" isn't that high on my priorities to collect (but it is on the list), so my own set includes some "sacrifices." [B]Claudius in [B]Provincial [/B]bronze![/B] [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=622873']BCD Peloponnesos 2782[/URL]: [ATTACH=full]1569111[/ATTACH] [B]Caligula (probably) on Reverse.[/B] My Caligula doesn't even have a Caligula portrait on the obverse, just him (probably) sitting on the curule! [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3835735']Ex ANS - HSA 1001.1.22981 (Huntington)[/URL]: [ATTACH=full]1569112[/ATTACH] [B]Otho & Titus Denarii -- Mostly![/B] Returning to the theme of 12 Caesar's Denarii, my Titus and my Otho have made some significant sacrifices for science. Both ex-Muona Coll., and Butcher & Ponting's [I]Metallurgy [/I]studies (see [URL='https://issuu.com/hjb-ancientcoins/docs/hjb_s_212th_buy_or_bid_sale']HJB BBS 212[/URL], 511 for a much larger group of them, originally incl. these two): [ATTACH=full]1569114[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1569113[/ATTACH] [B]A (time of) Galba Provincial AE ... or Maybe Not at All?[/B] My Galba, below, is probably the biggest sacrifice with respect to the goal of 12 Caesars coinage! (Never was a portrait at all, just a Persephone/Warrior [I]temp.[/I] Galba.) I collect coins that have somehow been part of the numismatic literature and I also like Countermarks and Provincials; it fits all of those. RPC has its doubts about this specimen's identification but I think BCD was right: struck & countermarked during the reign of Galba in Lokri Opuntii (BCD Lokris-Phokis 157.5 = [URL='https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/1/1342']RPC I Online 1342 example 14[/URL]): [ATTACH=full]1569115[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius vs Greek Provincial Drachm
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...