Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius imitations from Taman peninsula
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4977618, member: 19463"]This coin illustrates another point about our coins. There is a less than well defined line between what we call 'official' branch mint products and what we term 'barbarous'. Even with findspots, we can have trouble proving where something was made especially considering the considerable movements of military units in the early Severan period. To me, the frightening part is that I have not made a conscious effort to seek out variations on the theme from the civil war period (Pescennius through the punitive Parthian period). I would not be at all shoked to learn that there will be a considerable reevaluation of the whole question of what coinage was authorized by Septimius and what should be termed imitative. At my level, the coins below are confusing. I hope there is someone out there studying the matter in earnest. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1196019[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196020[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196021[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196022[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196023[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196024[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196025[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196026[/ATTACH] </p><p>This one is AE but denarius size.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1196027[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4977618, member: 19463"]This coin illustrates another point about our coins. There is a less than well defined line between what we call 'official' branch mint products and what we term 'barbarous'. Even with findspots, we can have trouble proving where something was made especially considering the considerable movements of military units in the early Severan period. To me, the frightening part is that I have not made a conscious effort to seek out variations on the theme from the civil war period (Pescennius through the punitive Parthian period). I would not be at all shoked to learn that there will be a considerable reevaluation of the whole question of what coinage was authorized by Septimius and what should be termed imitative. At my level, the coins below are confusing. I hope there is someone out there studying the matter in earnest. [ATTACH=full]1196019[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196020[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196021[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196022[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196023[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196024[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196025[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1196026[/ATTACH] This one is AE but denarius size. [ATTACH=full]1196027[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius imitations from Taman peninsula
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...