Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius imitations from Taman peninsula
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 4365228, member: 84905"]There are currently two Taman imitations for sale:</p><p>CNG</p><p><a href="https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3831&lot=573" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3831&lot=573" rel="nofollow">https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3831&lot=573</a></p><p>Heritage</p><p><a href="https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3801&lot=32180" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3801&lot=32180" rel="nofollow">https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3801&lot=32180</a></p><p><br /></p><p>CNG attributes the coin to "Goths". Heritage writes "Early Goths". Heritage cites my 2006 Celator article on the series as reference, plus the Soviet numismatist L. Kazamanova, 1961. I suspect that they have not consulted Kazamanova's article in Russian, but copied the reference from my article.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, neither CNG nor Heritage seem to have read my article either. If they had, they knew that these coins were not minted by "Goths" or "Early Goths". In Russian numismatics, these coins are frequently called "Taman imiations" "coins of the unknown people" and "Imitations of the type with walking Mars". These descriptions are admittedly not so exiting, but they are accurate.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Taman Peninsula (East of the Crimean Peninsula), where these coins were produced in the 3rd and 4th century was not settled by Goths before the late 5th/6th century. Hence, who ever made these coins, were certainly no Goths.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 4365228, member: 84905"]There are currently two Taman imitations for sale: CNG [URL]https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3831&lot=573[/URL] Heritage [URL]https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=3801&lot=32180[/URL] CNG attributes the coin to "Goths". Heritage writes "Early Goths". Heritage cites my 2006 Celator article on the series as reference, plus the Soviet numismatist L. Kazamanova, 1961. I suspect that they have not consulted Kazamanova's article in Russian, but copied the reference from my article. Anyway, neither CNG nor Heritage seem to have read my article either. If they had, they knew that these coins were not minted by "Goths" or "Early Goths". In Russian numismatics, these coins are frequently called "Taman imiations" "coins of the unknown people" and "Imitations of the type with walking Mars". These descriptions are admittedly not so exiting, but they are accurate. The Taman Peninsula (East of the Crimean Peninsula), where these coins were produced in the 3rd and 4th century was not settled by Goths before the late 5th/6th century. Hence, who ever made these coins, were certainly no Goths.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Denarius imitations from Taman peninsula
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...