Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="ErolGarip, post: 2824937, member: 88736"]I know it as I have been a lot in the industry  with dirty guys. A coin in their hands quickly wears even in a short time. On the other hand, for ex, gals are so kind to the coins, with soft touchs, that a coin does not wear even in a long time in their hands of gals. So, I pass "wear" criteria for uncirculated. Even if he takes his word back, I still stay with his definition of "SuperDave", "... if a coin is in your pocket, you know it is circulated..." Pocket is the most important thing in the definition of "circulation" of "money" in  a "community." I wrote these three words in " " as these are keywords in definition of circulated/uncirculated. Circulation: an action. Money (coin in particular): item we are talking about, that relates the individuals to each others. Community: a group of people such as a community in a country is the domain where action is questioned. So, probably you found it like a joke when I mentioned "presidents", but, if "representive" of  a "community" is a president, as also included as a criteria by numismatists as head of "governmental authority" about the coin, looking at the president only if he has a coin in his pocket or not is sufficient. Of course, we ourselves will not look into their pockets of presidents, but, they have hands, don't they.. So, what is the position of "pocket" in all these? Pocket is  about individuality, which is also about all individiuals which make them a community. Also, lets not forget that final destionation of a coin is the pocket... Only then, you have the right, on the coin, for action (here, circulation.) If a president does not have a 1cent (or, other coin in their domain), s/he does not have a right to talk about it, as it is not her/his. (until we see s/he has...)[/QUOTE]

Log in or Sign up

Reply to Thread

Useful Searches