Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;raider34, post: 910280, member: 16402&quot;]I agree with that 100%. There is also the other side to that, which is the better *struck* dates are usually graded stricter (which I also agree with).</p><p><br /></p><p>A good example is the &#039;79-&#039;82 S Morgan dollars (which are know for their sharp strike and strong luster). These coins are usually held to stricter standards than the average Morgan dollar. Then there are coins like the 1896-O which are so notorious for their weak strike and poor luster, that standards are weakened when grading them.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in