Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lugia, post: 908119, member: 21025&quot;]even tho there is quite more posted then what im quoting i most believe in the 1st part. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>on the other hand i completely disagree with the 2nd part. that is all subject to opinion. im having a hard time putting what i think into words. when people look at lincolns and mercury dimes ECT. we know what the &quot;key dates&quot; are. now compare these key dates to the mintages of coins from 1794. almost everything in 1794 would be a key date. on top of that with all the different types you have in 1794 is a S-65 going to be graded differently from an S-66 because ones a R1 and ones R5? i wouldnt know anything about how well they were struck to tell the difference in grade but i would expect a better explanation then &quot;its a tough sheldon in that date&quot;. its just that what is usually called key date doesnt seem key at all to me if i could goto ebay right now and pick one up like a 1877 IHC. if i wanted that i already know its going to be the most expensive piece in a IHC set so the last thing i want is it being overgraded because its &quot;key date&quot;. i know this isnt how the system works but this is the opinion ive formed based on what i collect. i hope some of this made sense to anyone.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in