Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2015610, member: 22331&quot;]I will try for brevity in my post, as this software has deleted past copious/voluminous posts.</p><p><br /></p><p>I trust you&#039;ll pardon my position as &quot;Devils Advocate&quot;, which I enjoy.</p><p><br /></p><p>I cited in the &quot;Upcoming episode ....&quot; thread, two examples of &quot;disparity (market/value?) grading&quot;. One of those was a 1924-D Standing Liberty quarter assigned a grade of MS67 by one of the acknowledged premier grading firms.</p><p><br /></p><p>I stated my experience with others in determining the relative value of the 1924-D coin. Dealers assigning a low grade as VG-F.</p><p><br /></p><p>I expect that in the future since there aren&#039;t published concise objective standards, disagreement between &quot;premier&quot; TPG, and laymen are now determining the value, that eventually a jury of &quot;laymen&quot; will establish damages to clients of the numismatic &quot;industry&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>That 1924-D coin in published documents has a MS67 value of $3500. $130 in Fine condition.</p><p>If it was determined to be &quot;Full Head&quot;, a stated value of $45000. If it was determined to be a + grade, as I believe it to be, an increased value of ~70%, to have an ~ value of $75000.</p><p><br /></p><p>If a jury of &quot;laymen&quot; can be convinced by &quot;comparable grading&quot;, of the elevated value, the real and punitive damages on this singular coin could be appreciable.</p><p><br /></p><p>Are there appreciable damages effected by &quot;Market/Value&quot; grading practices?</p><p><br /></p><p>I rest my case to a jury of believed peers.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in