Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ordinary Fool, post: 2783915, member: 85318&quot;]I respectfully dissent saying baloney and if you consider that the OP&#039;s picture is anything like reasonable &quot;digital imaging&quot; (may as well coat the lens with crisco) then you are quite liberal with your ideas of digital photography.</p><p><br /></p><p>I certainly know what lamination looks like just as I do die cracks on dirty coins. I&#039;m not saying it is a die crack, I&#039;m saying the picture fails.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just because it&#039;s almost 100% certain to be a lamination doesn&#039;t mean that low contrast and fuzzy digital thing conclusively reveals it. It doesn&#039;t and I&#039;ve no idea why anyone rational would disagree with that premise.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just compare the OP image to the one I linked in this thread from another here.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is a very reasonable and honest premise, unlike implying I don&#039;t know what a lamination looks like or don&#039;t understand digital photography in the narrow and specific area of anvil simple lamination or die cracks.</p><p><br /></p><p>Really?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in