Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Decline and Atrophy.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Magnus Maximus, post: 2656870, member: 73473"]Emperor Isaac II was born in 1156 to the Angelos family, who were distantly related to the ruling Imperial family. Isaac first shows up in the history books during the reign of Andronikos I was he was leading a revolt in Nicaea against him. Surprisingly, Andronikos didn't have Isaac executed, and he was allowed to live in relative peace in the capital. This show of mercy would be Andronikos's downfall, as he was greatly despised and hated by the people in Constantinople who were more than willing to replace him with a member of the extended Imperial clan. Isaac waited until Andronikos was out of the capital and then launched his revolt. Andronikos was eventually hunted down and brutally killed.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Isaac II inherited a weakened Empire, the turks were slowly advancing in Anatolia, the Normans(<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />) were invading Illyria and Greece, and the Imperial coffers were empty. The most pressing issue for the new monarch was the Normans who had recently sacked Thessaloniki, and who were marching toward Constantinople with the intent to destroy the Empire. Isaac must have been nervous about this situation and for a good reason; the Normans were the elite shock troopers of their day who had laid waste to numerous armies. Isaac sent the most qualified man in the Roman Empire, and possibly the entire east, to beat the Normans: Alexios Branas.</p><p><br /></p><p>Branas's army was composed of Mercenaries, some were of Norman extraction, and local levees and numbered about 25,000. The Normans, on the other hand, were said to number over 90,000 and were composed of Norman Knights and local Sicilian levees. The battle between the two armies is not well documented, but we know that both armies came to a sort of temporary truce until Branas surprised the Normans and routed them. The battle broke the Norman Kingdom of Sicily, within a few years they were to be conquered by the Holy Roman Empire. It was said that the Normans lost over 80,000 men compared to a few thousand "Byzantines."</p><p><br /></p><p>The victory at Demetrizes over the Normans should have ushered in a new era for the Romans as they had effectively destroyed their biggest rival and threat. Instead, it would be remembered as the final war that "Byzantium" would decisively win.</p><p>A few months after the victory the Bulgarians revolted against Imperial rule. Isaac sent Branas to deal with the rebellion in 1186. Branas had a good amount of success and was about to crush the rebellion until he got the idea to revolt against Isaac. Branas's rebellion failed, but it allowed the bulgarians to regroup and defeat the next army Isaac sent against them. After the loss of the war with bugaria, Isaac became detached from reality and didn't care about governing. The Empire was already atrophied after the death of Manuel Komnenos in 1180, but the neglect of Isaac furthered the decline and fall of the Eastern Roman Empire.</p><p>Isaac II would be overthrown in 1195 by his brother who surprisingly would be worse for the Empire, but thats a story for another time.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Empire only two years into Isaac's reign.</p><p>Note the loss of bulgaria and serbia.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]588687[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]588689[/ATTACH] </p><p>A picture of Emperor Isaac II himself.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]588694[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]588695[/ATTACH] </p><p>Isaac II Billon Trachy</p><p>[ATTACH=full]588696[/ATTACH] </p><p>A Norman Knight.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Magnus Maximus, post: 2656870, member: 73473"]Emperor Isaac II was born in 1156 to the Angelos family, who were distantly related to the ruling Imperial family. Isaac first shows up in the history books during the reign of Andronikos I was he was leading a revolt in Nicaea against him. Surprisingly, Andronikos didn't have Isaac executed, and he was allowed to live in relative peace in the capital. This show of mercy would be Andronikos's downfall, as he was greatly despised and hated by the people in Constantinople who were more than willing to replace him with a member of the extended Imperial clan. Isaac waited until Andronikos was out of the capital and then launched his revolt. Andronikos was eventually hunted down and brutally killed. Isaac II inherited a weakened Empire, the turks were slowly advancing in Anatolia, the Normans(;)) were invading Illyria and Greece, and the Imperial coffers were empty. The most pressing issue for the new monarch was the Normans who had recently sacked Thessaloniki, and who were marching toward Constantinople with the intent to destroy the Empire. Isaac must have been nervous about this situation and for a good reason; the Normans were the elite shock troopers of their day who had laid waste to numerous armies. Isaac sent the most qualified man in the Roman Empire, and possibly the entire east, to beat the Normans: Alexios Branas. Branas's army was composed of Mercenaries, some were of Norman extraction, and local levees and numbered about 25,000. The Normans, on the other hand, were said to number over 90,000 and were composed of Norman Knights and local Sicilian levees. The battle between the two armies is not well documented, but we know that both armies came to a sort of temporary truce until Branas surprised the Normans and routed them. The battle broke the Norman Kingdom of Sicily, within a few years they were to be conquered by the Holy Roman Empire. It was said that the Normans lost over 80,000 men compared to a few thousand "Byzantines." The victory at Demetrizes over the Normans should have ushered in a new era for the Romans as they had effectively destroyed their biggest rival and threat. Instead, it would be remembered as the final war that "Byzantium" would decisively win. A few months after the victory the Bulgarians revolted against Imperial rule. Isaac sent Branas to deal with the rebellion in 1186. Branas had a good amount of success and was about to crush the rebellion until he got the idea to revolt against Isaac. Branas's rebellion failed, but it allowed the bulgarians to regroup and defeat the next army Isaac sent against them. After the loss of the war with bugaria, Isaac became detached from reality and didn't care about governing. The Empire was already atrophied after the death of Manuel Komnenos in 1180, but the neglect of Isaac furthered the decline and fall of the Eastern Roman Empire. Isaac II would be overthrown in 1195 by his brother who surprisingly would be worse for the Empire, but thats a story for another time. The Empire only two years into Isaac's reign. Note the loss of bulgaria and serbia. [ATTACH=full]588687[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]588689[/ATTACH] A picture of Emperor Isaac II himself. [ATTACH=full]588694[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]588695[/ATTACH] Isaac II Billon Trachy [ATTACH=full]588696[/ATTACH] A Norman Knight.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Decline and Atrophy.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...