Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;samjimmy, post: 114731, member: 3813&quot;]The 2nd one is probably about as good as you&#039;ll get with whatever you&#039;re using.&nbsp; To tighen it up more, you&#039;d have to invest in some better equipment.&nbsp; The first one is just big, but it&#039;s not sharp, similar to the other one you posted.&nbsp; Unless you have a real need to get something better than <a href="http://www.mrbrklyn.com/coins/dsc00026.png" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.mrbrklyn.com/coins/dsc00026.png" rel="nofollow">this</a>, then it&#039;s fine IMHO.</p><p><br /></p><p>One more thing to think about...&nbsp; lighting tends to look the most natural when coming from the top (more like the first picture in the above post) as opposed to coming in from the side.&nbsp; You&#039;d reflect it to give it side lighting, same as you&#039;d do a person in the studio (expose for the face, top/back light should be a couple stops over).</p><p><br /></p><p>Sadly I sold all of my expensive equipment (and 99.9% of the cheap stuff) many, many years ago and don&#039;t have camera, lenses, or lighting to post something.&nbsp; I&#039;ll be trying to do it on the cheap as well, as I have no urge to get back into that business, and thus won&#039;t be buying any of that again.&nbsp; If you&#039;re in Brooklyn though you could rent some things out for a day or two and play without having to shell out loads of cash.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in