Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jack D. Young, post: 3100603, member: 93371&quot;]Justafarmer, we identified this example as the probable source back in 2015 primarily due to the “crispness” of the strike/ attribution sister marks relative to images of other examples we have seen.</p><p><br /></p><p>The damage at the “A” of HALF appears different to the presumed counterfeits in that it appears more as a line or deep nick, where the others look more “plugged”, an assumed result of the die making process. Also the depth of the scratch over the “L” appears more significant than on the others.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]784664[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>It is admittedly speculation at this time…[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in