Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 25105, member: 112&quot;]The story is the same now as it was then - opinions. Trouble is, some opinions can&#039;t be trusted as much as others. </p><p><br /></p><p>And we need a bit more than to switch from market grading to technical grading. We also need a universal set of grading standards. I&#039;ve written about this so many times that I don&#039;t even like to write about it anymore. But ya never know - maybe someday - people will actually listen&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s what we have now - I know of at least 3 times that the ANA has changed their grading standards over the years. NGC has theirs - PCGS has theirs - ANACS has theirs - ICG has theirs - and all of the other grading companies - well they say they have standards&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>And then of course you have the various sets of standards that collectors &amp; dealers everywhere use - and they&#039;re all different !!</p><p><br /></p><p>We need 1 - just 1 - that everybody uses and aheres to.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in