Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
David Vagi "Grading Ancient Coins" article
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bart9349, post: 1309931, member: 5682"]I will dissent here. I think hammered coins (that have usually been buried in the ground for a longtime) deserve a different assessment method from modern milled coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>I think he is correct in dividing the coin assessment into two values: strike and surface.</p><p><br /></p><p>Strike reflects the coin at the time of mint: "centering, strength and uniformity of strike, cacks, and die condition." I think many collectors of modern coins expect some consistancy in these aspects with modern milled coins. Ancient coins are so fascinating because of the great variability in hand-cut dies, hand-produced planchets, and hand-struck coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>Surface reflects what happens to the coin after being stuck. Defects at the time of striking can impair surface quality, but a lot of factors occur while in circulation. This includes such things as "test cuts, bankers' marks, clipping, countermarks, and graffitto."</p><p><br /></p><p>For me, therefore, both strike and surface can be interesting and are important. They should also be separated when assessing Ancient coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm not so sure that Ancients lend themselves to the nuances of grading, however. Fortunately, I don't think Vagi does the grading of Ancients as vigorously as one would with modern coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Grading and slabbing of Ancients is not important for most collectors of Ancients. Fortunately, Ancient collectors aren't obsessed with such childish things as "registry sets." (Ancients are truly the case where one should "buy the coin and not the plastic.') </p><p><br /></p><p>That said, I think Vagi has brought a useful framework and systematic approach in assessing Ancient coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, the article in the same magazine "Numismatics on the Brain" was pretty interesting. The discussion on the neurobiology of collecting was very educational. I guess one doesn't have to be insane to collect. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>guy[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bart9349, post: 1309931, member: 5682"]I will dissent here. I think hammered coins (that have usually been buried in the ground for a longtime) deserve a different assessment method from modern milled coins. I think he is correct in dividing the coin assessment into two values: strike and surface. Strike reflects the coin at the time of mint: "centering, strength and uniformity of strike, cacks, and die condition." I think many collectors of modern coins expect some consistancy in these aspects with modern milled coins. Ancient coins are so fascinating because of the great variability in hand-cut dies, hand-produced planchets, and hand-struck coins. Surface reflects what happens to the coin after being stuck. Defects at the time of striking can impair surface quality, but a lot of factors occur while in circulation. This includes such things as "test cuts, bankers' marks, clipping, countermarks, and graffitto." For me, therefore, both strike and surface can be interesting and are important. They should also be separated when assessing Ancient coins. I'm not so sure that Ancients lend themselves to the nuances of grading, however. Fortunately, I don't think Vagi does the grading of Ancients as vigorously as one would with modern coinage. Grading and slabbing of Ancients is not important for most collectors of Ancients. Fortunately, Ancient collectors aren't obsessed with such childish things as "registry sets." (Ancients are truly the case where one should "buy the coin and not the plastic.') That said, I think Vagi has brought a useful framework and systematic approach in assessing Ancient coins. BTW, the article in the same magazine "Numismatics on the Brain" was pretty interesting. The discussion on the neurobiology of collecting was very educational. I guess one doesn't have to be insane to collect. :eek: guy[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
David Vagi "Grading Ancient Coins" article
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...