Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Dating Proserpina - Crawford 405/4b
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 5347922, member: 99456"]Thanks [USER=44132]@Bing[/USER], [USER=51347]@Alegandron[/USER], [USER=85693]@Marsyas Mike[/USER] and [USER=19615]@Volodya[/USER] for the nice additions to thread - I guess I need some new words to describe the coins of [USER=19615]@Volodya[/USER] - as usual in a league of their own. I might be satisfied just collecting photographs of these coins <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Thanks [USER=89514]@curtislclay[/USER], your date is right, and OP not a mistake (however, 100 coins - not 100 auction houses) - if you search ACSearch for "<a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=plaetorius%20eagle%2057" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=plaetorius%20eagle%2057" rel="nofollow">plaetorius eagle 57</a>" you find >100 coins dated <span style="color: #b30000"><u>57 BC</u></span> that should be dated <span style="color: #006600">67 BC</span> to align with both Crawford and Hersh-Walker date of 67 BC. My assumption is this is from some bad cut & paste around the dates for M. Plaetorius coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 5347922, member: 99456"]Thanks [USER=44132]@Bing[/USER], [USER=51347]@Alegandron[/USER], [USER=85693]@Marsyas Mike[/USER] and [USER=19615]@Volodya[/USER] for the nice additions to thread - I guess I need some new words to describe the coins of [USER=19615]@Volodya[/USER] - as usual in a league of their own. I might be satisfied just collecting photographs of these coins :) Thanks [USER=89514]@curtislclay[/USER], your date is right, and OP not a mistake (however, 100 coins - not 100 auction houses) - if you search ACSearch for "[URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=plaetorius%20eagle%2057']plaetorius eagle 57[/URL]" you find >100 coins dated [COLOR=#b30000][U]57 BC[/U][/COLOR] that should be dated [COLOR=#006600]67 BC[/COLOR] to align with both Crawford and Hersh-Walker date of 67 BC. My assumption is this is from some bad cut & paste around the dates for M. Plaetorius coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Dating Proserpina - Crawford 405/4b
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...