Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;snaz, post: 914547, member: 11315&quot;]That really just comes down to personal opinion. For me, the way I view AT coins, is not necesarily the process involved in toning the coin, but the motive behind it. If a seller is toning coins in an oven, napkin, windowsill, or folder with the INTENT to sell the coin for a profit as TONED then IMO that is morally wrong. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Please, don&#039;t try and talk to me like I&#039;m a kid Andrew. </p><p>See my definition above. We have had this discussion here on cointalk, and many other forums for that matter, many many times as to what classifies a coin as AT&#039;d. And we have never come to a conclusion as to how to define AT.</p><p>If a coin will look the same when it leaves a taco bell napkin, as to when it left the oven, as to when it left the folder you put it in to tone it... Then to me it doesn&#039;t matter where it came from.. your MOTIVE was to tone it.. Artificially at that.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in