Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;d.t.menace, post: 1107876, member: 18944&quot;]My problem with the ASE proof is the fact that the mint did make ASE&#039;s in &#039;09, the only difference being the finish on the coin. If we accept these do we then have to accept it if someone were to come along and make a burnished finish one? After all the mint didn&#039;t make any of those in &#039;09 either.</p><p>&nbsp;I think we&#039;re going down the wrong path in this hobby if we start accepting things that are on the outer fringes and shady areas of the law, arguing and rationalizing minor tecnicalities to justify an acceptance of these coins. It just opens up a crack for the next joker to come along and push the envelop even more, in the name of having something &quot;neat&quot; or &quot;different&quot;.</p><p>&nbsp;I know on one of these DC threads that someone mentioned that if these came from China would we still feel the same way about them. I don&#039;t remember anyone responding to that question. If any of you defenders would like to address this I&#039;d like to hear your <i><u>honest</u></i> opinion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in