Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mikenoodle, post: 1106812, member: 307&quot;]I have never any offense taken medoraman. This is good healthy debate and it has never gotten personal. </p><p><br /></p><p>The date may have been legally struck, but it is Mr. Carr&#039;s contention that the US Government has released statements that the 64-D Peace Dollars don&#039;t exist, that they were all melted. This is one of the bases of his argument.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1933 $20 was never purported by the US Government to be non-existent outside of the Mint, it was merely illegal to own one and subject to confiscation. To date, no 64-D Peace Dollar has ever surfaced further substantiating Carr&#039;s claim. This makes any genuine 64-D illegal to own.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;Carr is not taking an 1895-S Morgan and striking it as a Philadelphia coin, they exist. He has been careful to choose a coin that will not surface, that is illegal to own and that if it surfaced, would be confiscated. </p><p><br /></p><p>I will also add that Mr. Carr has hi-resolution pictures on his web site of his coins and the identification diagnostics of his coins. Authenticating one of these fantasy pieces as one of Mr. Carr&#039;s is simple with the high resolution pictures.As I had said in the interview, &quot;anyone who does any due diligence to research this coin finds almost immediately that these coins exist and checking the Carr web site can be traced to their manufacturer.&quot; It&#039;s on the first page of a google search under 64-D Peace Dollar.</p><p><br /></p><p>Admittedly, I started out on your side of the fence, but after listening and talking to Daniel personally, I have come to see the light in what he is asserting.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in