Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1412933, member: 19065&quot;]I defend this topic with facts, deflect the hacks and will inform you that you were never on my blocked list. You are simply another sore-looser who was once or twice corrected for your careless comments. You have since never dropped your grudge you bear for having been called on your inconsistencies. The secret as you put it, is rather, that you step in messes all the time. We seen plenty of your &#039;apology&#039; comments and entire apology threads in which you try to sweet talk people back to your favor as you backtrack your way out of them with coy follow ups or stepping into a thread, such as now at this point suddenly to say nothing effects you, not even facts apparently...&nbsp; but it&#039;s not that hard to wipe clean your footsteps as you retreat from your sticky faux pas. They exist in forums for those who can see through your constant barrage of jesting bull, to interpret for what they really are.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>At this point, in this thread, enough facts to the contrary of the negative opinions expressed towards Mr. Carr&#039;s work exist now, such that any further opinion negatively expressed about it, is simply a failing on the behalf of those opining who continue to do so in utter refusal of informing themselves that these works are legitimate, and that they are not counterfeits seeking subversive nor fraudulent gains. No further comment is necessary to defend his work for those who would or have taken the time to understand the factors that differentiate his work from something else a few would have us believe his works are on par with.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I meet plenty of insolent stubborn comments on this forum, particularly on this topic, by those who refuse to discuss anything but instead delight in deviant distraction of playing the offended party with opinions-only who drag these threads down into flame wars. Let it be shown that cpm9ball, has just entered this conversations with a past grudge, a load of distorted perceptions about my comments and himself giving no facts to counter mine, presenting himself as some sort of victim but an impervious one unwilling to explain how something unique can be a &quot;knock-off&quot;. He offered this thread nothing but another useless personal opinion with a negative application of &quot;knock-off&quot; to announce his deep thinking on this. Past threads have shown his comments consistent even when DC himself has stepped in and quieted every other negative point posted about his work and the legality of the issue. Your &quot;opinion&quot; based comments only stand a few casual posts until they are met by facts, when it&#039;s by me, you think you can have a fight and call me a zealot but when Daniel steps in, it is very interesting to see you scurry away real fast. This is just another repetition of your factless commentary and careless mannerisms.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in