Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;chip, post: 1412812, member: 19122&quot;]I like the fantasy pieces, and the logic that you can not make a copy of something that never was.</p><p><br /></p><p>Three cheers for Daniel Carr, he brings some more fun into the hobby, It is nice to see the face of an old time dealer looking at a 1970 Dated Ike, or a 1964 Franklin. </p><p><br /></p><p>Some have had a sort of bad reaction once it is told what they are, but these are not copies, I would also shun Mr. Carr if he was producing 1895 Proof Morgans, or 1909s vdbs, such as some unscrupulous manufacturers have done.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just to add a little bit, of more gray to the discussion, what about the restrikes that were done on the midnight shift at the mint? Or the coins that were NOT supposed to exist such as the 1913 V nickels?</p><p><br /></p><p>I wonder since the 1964 peace dollars were all supposed to be demonetized, and also the 1933 double eagles, why the recent hoard of ten double eagles were confiscated, and any replicas of those are supposed to carry the word copy, why this does not apply to the 1964 Fantasy dollars? Unless it is because they are not sold as being the product of the mint? But if a coin gold 1933 double eagle were to be made without the word copy, as a fantasy piece, or a 1913 V nickel if those particular coins would be considered to be confiscatable?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in