Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Daniel Carr Strikes Again!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="1865King, post: 7587731, member: 103207"]Yes but technically it's not. Back in the late 50's into the early 60's it was considered part of the Indian cent series. 1,000 non proofs were made and just a few proofs. Two different sets of dies. One for the proofs and one for the circulation strikes. J-228 I have both types. Note there are some certified as proof that really aren't.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="1865King, post: 7587731, member: 103207"]Yes but technically it's not. Back in the late 50's into the early 60's it was considered part of the Indian cent series. 1,000 non proofs were made and just a few proofs. Two different sets of dies. One for the proofs and one for the circulation strikes. J-228 I have both types. Note there are some certified as proof that really aren't.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Daniel Carr Strikes Again!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...