Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Damaged Proofs HELP
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="USS656, post: 204302, member: 6641"]New coins should be overly shinny if they have a mirror finish.?.</p><p> </p><p>I have no doubt that hamman88 did damage using turpentine, fingers, and a cotton shirt. I believe that he cannot see it with his naked eye. (As a result of this thread I am getting a loupe as I know now I really should look at a coin under magnification.) My camera helps me get there but it is not practical just for general observation. I also believe that a month from now those coins could and probably will look really bad even compared to the greasy fingerprints that were removed. I would agree that he may want to sell them with the comment that he does not know the complete history of the coins. It's not a lie and it gives the seller fair warning. The other side of that is he may want to keep them to see what happens to them and just spend them if they go south. The cost is not significant and the lesson would be a good one to learn - And I don't mean that in a negative way.</p><p> </p><p>So far I haven't heard Hamman88 blame anyone for anything that has transpired. I think everyone has made it pretty clear that the method he choose was not a good one. No matter how nice they look now, I am sure in his heart he believes that damage was done at some level even if the coins look much better that they did. And I'm sure he will not be surprised if a month from now the coins start to show unattractive coloring / spotting / tarnishing. If that happens, I hope we have pictures of how they look now and pictures of how they turn. </p><p> </p><p>I understand why no one said to do this, then do this, and have the end result be something they get blamed for. I'm sure it has happened exactly that way before with probably more at stake. Roy was nice enough to step in and say <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> don't listen to bad advice from someone who doesn't know better and offer advice for the best chance at minimal damage. Now I just hope those of us that are reading this thread that have little to no experience, can take something positive from it. Photos would help achieve that both now and a couple months from now. Don't get me wrong, even if they look good in the future I would not use the same technique hamman88 used. It would just be good to see how the coins have been affected.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="USS656, post: 204302, member: 6641"]New coins should be overly shinny if they have a mirror finish.?. I have no doubt that hamman88 did damage using turpentine, fingers, and a cotton shirt. I believe that he cannot see it with his naked eye. (As a result of this thread I am getting a loupe as I know now I really should look at a coin under magnification.) My camera helps me get there but it is not practical just for general observation. I also believe that a month from now those coins could and probably will look really bad even compared to the greasy fingerprints that were removed. I would agree that he may want to sell them with the comment that he does not know the complete history of the coins. It's not a lie and it gives the seller fair warning. The other side of that is he may want to keep them to see what happens to them and just spend them if they go south. The cost is not significant and the lesson would be a good one to learn - And I don't mean that in a negative way. So far I haven't heard Hamman88 blame anyone for anything that has transpired. I think everyone has made it pretty clear that the method he choose was not a good one. No matter how nice they look now, I am sure in his heart he believes that damage was done at some level even if the coins look much better that they did. And I'm sure he will not be surprised if a month from now the coins start to show unattractive coloring / spotting / tarnishing. If that happens, I hope we have pictures of how they look now and pictures of how they turn. I understand why no one said to do this, then do this, and have the end result be something they get blamed for. I'm sure it has happened exactly that way before with probably more at stake. Roy was nice enough to step in and say :eek: don't listen to bad advice from someone who doesn't know better and offer advice for the best chance at minimal damage. Now I just hope those of us that are reading this thread that have little to no experience, can take something positive from it. Photos would help achieve that both now and a couple months from now. Don't get me wrong, even if they look good in the future I would not use the same technique hamman88 used. It would just be good to see how the coins have been affected.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Damaged Proofs HELP
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...