Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
"cuprite gently levelled out in parts"
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24896920, member: 26430"]I'm not sure I can see any major tooling on the Hadrian (beyond smoothing and other typical mechanical processing for a coin like that). But others might see something I miss or interpret it differently. All these photos have a lot of shadows, so it's hard to be certain.</p><p><br /></p><p>(On the Leo Benz / Lanz 94 photo [previous comments], there is a weird shadow in hair above eye, but nothing off there in Roma's photos.)</p><p><br /></p><p><i>Edit: The ear does look a little funny... </i></p><p><br /></p><p><b>All from the same die pair:</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1599695[/ATTACH] </b></p><p><b><i>Top</i></b><i>:</i> Bigger image of the other example from the same dies (the famous Numismatica Genevensis 5 specimen that sold for like $2M).</p><p><b><i>Middle</i></b>: The present coin (Lanz 94/Leo Benz & Roma & LAC VCoins).</p><p><b><i>Bottom</i></b>: NAC 54, 432, which hammered at 95,000 CHF in 2010 (roughly $120,000 after fees)!</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is NAC's interesting commentary:</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p>An extraordinary portrait work of an excellent master engraver. [...]</p><p><br /></p><p>Among the great prizes of Roman coinage are medallic sestertii which Charles Seltman attributed to an artist he dubbed the ‘Alphaeus Master’. This engraver may have been the sculptor Antonianus of Aphrodisias, whose style epitomised the Hadrianic revival of Greek classicism, but with that speculation aside we may say he is the most celebrated die engraver of the Roman period to have been identified by his body of work.</p><p><br /></p><p>We might suspect he was a member of the inner circle of Hadrian, an emperor who was so completely infatuated with Greek art and culture that he would have made Greece his home had his obligations not interfered. He became familiar with Athens as a young man, and in 112 was elected archon of the city; as emperor he travelled to Greece in 124/5, 128 and 131, typically residing in his favourite city, Athens.</p><p><br /></p><p>This sestertius very likely was struck in 135 for Hadrian's vicennalia (20th anniversary). The selection of Pax as the reverse type may well be a reference to the emperor's hope for a speedy end to the Bar Kochba War in Judaea – a traumatic event that tarnished the last years of Hadrian's life.</p><p><br /></p><p>Toynbee describes these sestertii as 'medallic coins', for in her view they pair a regular reverse die for a sestertius with a portrait die intended to produce bronze medallions. Though it cannot be disproven that the reverse die was intended for standard coinage (after all, it does include SC in the inscription), the artistry is of such a high calibre it is hard to imagine that it was ever intended to produce regular-issue sestertii.</p><p><br /></p><p>Two bronze medallions in Gnecchi (pl. 42, nos. 3, 4) bear portraits that Toynbee rightly ascribes to the Alphaeus Master. The first is of a different die than the one used for the Pax sestertius and is paired with an anepigraphic reverse displaying the birds of the Capitoline Triad; the second appears to share the obverse die of the Pax sestertius, though in this case it is paired with an anepigraphic reverse showing a bridge with its span decorated with eight columns.</p><p><br /></p><p>Among other imperial issues produced by the Alphaeus Master we should add a bronze medallion showing on its reverse the forest-god Silvanus bringing a goat before a temple entrance (NAC 15, lot 355) and a silver medallion showing Athena and Poseidon in their competition to be the patron of Athens (NAC 18, lot 519). Other portraits of Hadrian of different composition might also be considered, as should some unusually refined reverse dies for bronze medallions (for example, Gnecchi II pl. 38, nos. 5 and 6; pl. 40, nos. 5-8; pl. 41, no. 2; and pl. 42, nos. 1 and 5).</p><p><br /></p><p>[NAC 54, 432: <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=758660" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=758660" rel="nofollow">on ACSearch.info</a> ; <a href="https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/catalogues/auction-54/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/catalogues/auction-54/" rel="nofollow">PDF Catalog</a> (and <a href="https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/prices-realized/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/prices-realized/" rel="nofollow">Price Realized</a> here) from their website]</p></blockquote><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24896920, member: 26430"]I'm not sure I can see any major tooling on the Hadrian (beyond smoothing and other typical mechanical processing for a coin like that). But others might see something I miss or interpret it differently. All these photos have a lot of shadows, so it's hard to be certain. (On the Leo Benz / Lanz 94 photo [previous comments], there is a weird shadow in hair above eye, but nothing off there in Roma's photos.) [I]Edit: The ear does look a little funny... [/I] [B]All from the same die pair: [ATTACH=full]1599695[/ATTACH] [I]Top[/I][/B][I]:[/I] Bigger image of the other example from the same dies (the famous Numismatica Genevensis 5 specimen that sold for like $2M). [B][I]Middle[/I][/B]: The present coin (Lanz 94/Leo Benz & Roma & LAC VCoins). [B][I]Bottom[/I][/B]: NAC 54, 432, which hammered at 95,000 CHF in 2010 (roughly $120,000 after fees)! Here is NAC's interesting commentary: [INDENT]An extraordinary portrait work of an excellent master engraver. [...] Among the great prizes of Roman coinage are medallic sestertii which Charles Seltman attributed to an artist he dubbed the ‘Alphaeus Master’. This engraver may have been the sculptor Antonianus of Aphrodisias, whose style epitomised the Hadrianic revival of Greek classicism, but with that speculation aside we may say he is the most celebrated die engraver of the Roman period to have been identified by his body of work. We might suspect he was a member of the inner circle of Hadrian, an emperor who was so completely infatuated with Greek art and culture that he would have made Greece his home had his obligations not interfered. He became familiar with Athens as a young man, and in 112 was elected archon of the city; as emperor he travelled to Greece in 124/5, 128 and 131, typically residing in his favourite city, Athens. This sestertius very likely was struck in 135 for Hadrian's vicennalia (20th anniversary). The selection of Pax as the reverse type may well be a reference to the emperor's hope for a speedy end to the Bar Kochba War in Judaea – a traumatic event that tarnished the last years of Hadrian's life. Toynbee describes these sestertii as 'medallic coins', for in her view they pair a regular reverse die for a sestertius with a portrait die intended to produce bronze medallions. Though it cannot be disproven that the reverse die was intended for standard coinage (after all, it does include SC in the inscription), the artistry is of such a high calibre it is hard to imagine that it was ever intended to produce regular-issue sestertii. Two bronze medallions in Gnecchi (pl. 42, nos. 3, 4) bear portraits that Toynbee rightly ascribes to the Alphaeus Master. The first is of a different die than the one used for the Pax sestertius and is paired with an anepigraphic reverse displaying the birds of the Capitoline Triad; the second appears to share the obverse die of the Pax sestertius, though in this case it is paired with an anepigraphic reverse showing a bridge with its span decorated with eight columns. Among other imperial issues produced by the Alphaeus Master we should add a bronze medallion showing on its reverse the forest-god Silvanus bringing a goat before a temple entrance (NAC 15, lot 355) and a silver medallion showing Athena and Poseidon in their competition to be the patron of Athens (NAC 18, lot 519). Other portraits of Hadrian of different composition might also be considered, as should some unusually refined reverse dies for bronze medallions (for example, Gnecchi II pl. 38, nos. 5 and 6; pl. 40, nos. 5-8; pl. 41, no. 2; and pl. 42, nos. 1 and 5). [NAC 54, 432: [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=758660']on ACSearch.info[/URL] ; [URL='https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/catalogues/auction-54/']PDF Catalog[/URL] (and [URL='https://www.arsclassicacoins.com/prices-realized/']Price Realized[/URL] here) from their website][/INDENT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
"cuprite gently levelled out in parts"
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...