Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;David Atherton, post: 2518513, member: 82616&quot;]Here is a link to the CoinsWeekly article Nicholas referred to.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/News/New-German-Cultural-Property-Protection-Act-into-effect/4?&amp;id=4234" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/News/New-German-Cultural-Property-Protection-Act-into-effect/4?&amp;id=4234" rel="nofollow">http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/News/New-German-Cultural-Property-Protection-Act-into-effect/4?&amp;id=4234</a></p><p><br /></p><p>From the interview with Ansgar Heveling, Chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary faction of the Committee on Culture and Media Affairs:</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;At this point, we have already integrated into the law what the jurisdiction of the Federal Fiscal Court had stipulated: The exclusion of coins as mass-produced goods. At least if they exist in large quantities and if they do not provide relevant and considerable information. Of course this is debatable. But because jurisdiction has introduced these terms, it seems to be a useful categorization to me. That’s why I assume that in the future the majority of coins will not be affected by the law.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>So, apparently Kunker is going with &#039;15b&#039; as far as ancient coins are concerned.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in