Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Cud on 2015P Saratoga?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="usmc60, post: 2544629, member: 76739"]Look we both think we have the best interest concerning new members. I firmly believed if you like it keep it. My piggy bank collection has some of the oddest coins. I know there's a lot of members out there that would not waste their time. And I'm surprised you didn't catch my misquote, which I hope to correct right now size does matter. In order to properly identify some errors size becomes a factor in determining the error. Example size determines a chip compared to a major die break a chip is under 4 MM's and a major die brakes 5 MM's and up. And as far as search engine goes my Windows 10 actually uses Google Chrome. Has served me faithfully for many years. Basically the point I was trying to make is there's so much information available. And a lot of that information is conflicting. One says one thing another says another. That's the only point I was trying to make about looking up cuds. Without starting another verbal war on coin talk. I have stopped expressing my personal opinions when it concerns cuds. It's easier to put a fake smile on my face and go with the flow. And if you want to know what I mean by this statement go to my first post snow on the roof. A lot of my beliefs still remain the same except for I do not express them it is not worth all the aggravation. And as far as cuds on coins go I have several listed there. And a variety listed on Wexler site. Unlike some. I managed to contribute a couple new fines a month in the doubled die varieties. I believe in less talk and more doing. Example. A lot of members on coin talk do a lot of repeating information. Two members questions. And the answer the questions quite eloquently. But one things lacking a visual example of what they're talking about. If say the members shows a coin that has been chemically treated. A lot of members have a lot to say about that coin but very few can go into their collection and pull one out. Because they do not waste their time on those kinds of coins. I guess they find it easier to go online and pull a photo that someone else is taken and display it as a chemically treated coin. But they actually do not own one. It's garbage to them and not worth their time. That's okay to each their own.USMC60[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="usmc60, post: 2544629, member: 76739"]Look we both think we have the best interest concerning new members. I firmly believed if you like it keep it. My piggy bank collection has some of the oddest coins. I know there's a lot of members out there that would not waste their time. And I'm surprised you didn't catch my misquote, which I hope to correct right now size does matter. In order to properly identify some errors size becomes a factor in determining the error. Example size determines a chip compared to a major die break a chip is under 4 MM's and a major die brakes 5 MM's and up. And as far as search engine goes my Windows 10 actually uses Google Chrome. Has served me faithfully for many years. Basically the point I was trying to make is there's so much information available. And a lot of that information is conflicting. One says one thing another says another. That's the only point I was trying to make about looking up cuds. Without starting another verbal war on coin talk. I have stopped expressing my personal opinions when it concerns cuds. It's easier to put a fake smile on my face and go with the flow. And if you want to know what I mean by this statement go to my first post snow on the roof. A lot of my beliefs still remain the same except for I do not express them it is not worth all the aggravation. And as far as cuds on coins go I have several listed there. And a variety listed on Wexler site. Unlike some. I managed to contribute a couple new fines a month in the doubled die varieties. I believe in less talk and more doing. Example. A lot of members on coin talk do a lot of repeating information. Two members questions. And the answer the questions quite eloquently. But one things lacking a visual example of what they're talking about. If say the members shows a coin that has been chemically treated. A lot of members have a lot to say about that coin but very few can go into their collection and pull one out. Because they do not waste their time on those kinds of coins. I guess they find it easier to go online and pull a photo that someone else is taken and display it as a chemically treated coin. But they actually do not own one. It's garbage to them and not worth their time. That's okay to each their own.USMC60[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Cud on 2015P Saratoga?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...