Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cucumbor's six - 2016 review
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Cucumbor, post: 2594833, member: 4298"]It seems to be fashionable to post our 2016 top of the pops these days !</p><p>This year as been a bit of a spring in some ways : after three years of very small spending on coins, I've been able to add 25 coins to my collections. I've selected six of them that fit the bill of being <i>out-standing</i> for various reasons.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>6 - rarity</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p>14 of my acquisitions of the year were for the principality of Dombes, gap fillers for the most part, with one exception being a double tournois minted in 1640, second or third known example of this type that year</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HKG3SbYuU2M/TLrPDszwj1I/AAAAAAAAATo/q4QVNWhEiyo/s1600/D-026-207-40_CGB.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>Gaston d'Orleans (1627-1650)</b></p><p>Double Tournois type 16, cuivre - 1640 - RRR</p><p>Atelier de Trévoux</p><p>+ GASTON . VSV D . LA . S[OVV . DO]M . G Buste drapé à l'antique à droite</p><p>+ DOVBLE . TOVRN[OIS . 1]640 Trois lis sous un lambel</p><p>2.62 gr</p><p>Ref : Divo Dombes # 205, CGKL # 752 (a4), Boudeau # 108</p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>5 - style</b></p><p><br /></p><p>The coinage of Mark Antony is very exciting and rewarding in terms of fascinating types and most important historical background. That said, stylewise, we have to admit his coins rarely show the best of engravors talent. When I saw the following, despite it's wear and flaws, I knew I had to have it :</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0023-056.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b> Mark Antony, Denarius </b> Struck in a travelling mint, moving with Mark Antony in 41 BC</p><p>ANT AVG IMP III VI R P C, Head of Mark Antony right</p><p>Fortuna standing left, holding rudder in right hand and cornucopiae in left; at feet, stork; below, PIETAS COS</p><p>3,82 gr - 20 mm</p><p>Ref : Crawford # 516/2, Sydenham # 1174, HCRI # 241, C # 77</p><p><br /></p><p>The following comment is copied from NAC auction # 52/294 about the very rare corresponding aureus :</p><p><i>The year 41 B.C., when this aureus was struck at a mint travelling in the East with Marc Antony, was a period of unusual calm for the triumvir, who took a welcomed, if unexpected, rest after the great victory he and Octavian had won late in 42 B.C. against Brutus and Cassius at the Battle of Philippi. Antony’s original plan of organising an invasion of Parthia was put on hold after he sailed to Tarsus, where he had summoned Cleopatra VII, the Greek queen of Egypt. She was to defend herself against accusations that she had aided Brutus and Cassius before Philippi, but it is generally agreed that the summons was merely a pretext for Antony’s plan to secure aid for his Parthian campaign. Their meeting was anything but a source of conflict; indeed, they found much common ground, including their agreement that it was in their mutual interests to execute Cleopatra’s sister and rival Arsinoe IV, who had been ruling Cyprus. In addition to sharing political interests, the two agreed that Antony would winter in Egypt to share a luxurious vacation with Cleopatra that caused a further postponement of Antony’s designs on Parthia. Thus began another of the queen’s liaisons with noble Romans, a prior having been Julius Caesar (and, according to Plutarch, Pompey Jr. before him). During the course of his stay in Egypt Cleopatra was impregnated, which resulted in twins born to her in 40 B.C. But this care-free period was only a momentary calm in the storm, for trouble was brewing in both the East and the West. Early in 40 B.C. Syria was overrun by the Parthians, seemingly while Antony travelled to Italy to meet Octavian following the Perusine War, in which Octavian defeated the armies of Antony’s wife and brother. The conflict with Octavian was resolved when they signed a pact at Brundisium in October, and Syria was eventually recovered through the efforts of Antony’s commanders from 40 to 38 B.C.</i></p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>4 - long sought after</b></p><p><br /></p><p>For decades I've been running after a Livia middle bronze. She was the main character in the play, the only one to whom everyone was related, either by blood, poison or politics. Although they're not rare, it's been quite difficult for me to find one that I and my wallet would equaly like</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0038-310.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b> Livia (+ AD 29), Dupondius </b> Rome mint, AD 22-23 under the reign of Tiberius</p><p>SALVS AVGVSTA, draped bust of Salus (Livia) right</p><p>TI CAESAR DIVI AVG F AVG P M TR POT XXIIII, around large S C</p><p>13.90 g, 27 mm,.</p><p>Ref : RCV # 1740 (450), Cohen # 5 (6), RIC I, 47.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>3 - beauty</b></p><p><br /></p><p>That one hasn't been on my list (I didn't even know it existed before I saw it), and I'm rather straight about attractiveness, but I've been blown away by the beauty of that portrait</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0010-068d.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b> M. Plaetorius M.f. Cestianus. Denarius </b> Rome mint, c. 69 BC</p><p>Male head right (Mercury ?) with flowing hair. Behind symbol</p><p>M·PLAETORI – CEST·EX·S·C Winged caduceus</p><p>18 mm, 3,86 gr</p><p>Ref : RCV #344, RSC Plaetoria # 5, Sydenham # 807, RBW # 1453, Crawford # 405/5</p><p><i>From the E.E. Clain-Stefanelli collection</i></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>2 - friendship</b></p><p><br /></p><p>I've bought the following for the first time in 2005. In 2008 I sold it to a very good friend who sadly passed away four years ago. I've since stayed in contact with his mother who is, as one can imagine, still devastated by the loss of her sole kid. For the first time this year we had the opportunity to meet in real life, and in loving memory of her son and our friendship she offered to give it back to me. Of course I refused unless she would <i>sell </i>it back instead of <i>giving </i>it</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]565360[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Otacilia Severa, Sestertius </b>struck in Rome on a medallic flan, 244-245 AD</p><p>MARCIA OTACIL SEVERA AVG, Diademed and draped bust of Otacilia right</p><p>PVDICITIA AVG. Pudicitia seated left holding sceptre</p><p>22.70 gr, <b>35 mm</b></p><p>Ref : Cohen # 55, RC #9169</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>1 - love</b></p><p><br /></p><p>For hours, and for sentimental reasons, I've hesitated about which of the two first coins would be #1, and being quite an optimistic guy I decided life is above death so here is #1. As I told in the related thread (<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/between-my-wife-and-i-an-owl-story.280813/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/between-my-wife-and-i-an-owl-story.280813/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/between-my-wife-and-i-an-owl-story.280813/</a>) my wife is kind enough to support my passion for coins and sometimes spend much more than I would dare to just for gifting me with some astounding coin. She, and the coin she bought for me deserves to be #1 any day</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/athena-owl-jpg.516189/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>ATTICA, Athens. </b>Circa 454-404 BC. AR Tetradrachm</p><p>Helmeted head of Athena right, with frontal eye</p><p>Owl standing right, head facing, olive sprig and crescent behind, all within incuse square. ΑΘΕ in the right field</p><p>24mm, 17.08 g, 8h</p><p>Ref : Kroll # 8; HGC # 4,1597</p><p><br /></p><p>I wish to all and everyone a merry Xmas and a happy new year</p><p>Q[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Cucumbor, post: 2594833, member: 4298"]It seems to be fashionable to post our 2016 top of the pops these days ! This year as been a bit of a spring in some ways : after three years of very small spending on coins, I've been able to add 25 coins to my collections. I've selected six of them that fit the bill of being [I]out-standing[/I] for various reasons. [B] 6 - rarity [/B] 14 of my acquisitions of the year were for the principality of Dombes, gap fillers for the most part, with one exception being a double tournois minted in 1640, second or third known example of this type that year [IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HKG3SbYuU2M/TLrPDszwj1I/AAAAAAAAATo/q4QVNWhEiyo/s1600/D-026-207-40_CGB.jpg[/IMG] [B]Gaston d'Orleans (1627-1650)[/B] Double Tournois type 16, cuivre - 1640 - RRR Atelier de Trévoux + GASTON . VSV D . LA . S[OVV . DO]M . G Buste drapé à l'antique à droite + DOVBLE . TOVRN[OIS . 1]640 Trois lis sous un lambel 2.62 gr Ref : Divo Dombes # 205, CGKL # 752 (a4), Boudeau # 108 [B] 5 - style[/B] The coinage of Mark Antony is very exciting and rewarding in terms of fascinating types and most important historical background. That said, stylewise, we have to admit his coins rarely show the best of engravors talent. When I saw the following, despite it's wear and flaws, I knew I had to have it : [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0023-056.jpg[/IMG] [B] Mark Antony, Denarius [/B] Struck in a travelling mint, moving with Mark Antony in 41 BC ANT AVG IMP III VI R P C, Head of Mark Antony right Fortuna standing left, holding rudder in right hand and cornucopiae in left; at feet, stork; below, PIETAS COS 3,82 gr - 20 mm Ref : Crawford # 516/2, Sydenham # 1174, HCRI # 241, C # 77 The following comment is copied from NAC auction # 52/294 about the very rare corresponding aureus : [I]The year 41 B.C., when this aureus was struck at a mint travelling in the East with Marc Antony, was a period of unusual calm for the triumvir, who took a welcomed, if unexpected, rest after the great victory he and Octavian had won late in 42 B.C. against Brutus and Cassius at the Battle of Philippi. Antony’s original plan of organising an invasion of Parthia was put on hold after he sailed to Tarsus, where he had summoned Cleopatra VII, the Greek queen of Egypt. She was to defend herself against accusations that she had aided Brutus and Cassius before Philippi, but it is generally agreed that the summons was merely a pretext for Antony’s plan to secure aid for his Parthian campaign. Their meeting was anything but a source of conflict; indeed, they found much common ground, including their agreement that it was in their mutual interests to execute Cleopatra’s sister and rival Arsinoe IV, who had been ruling Cyprus. In addition to sharing political interests, the two agreed that Antony would winter in Egypt to share a luxurious vacation with Cleopatra that caused a further postponement of Antony’s designs on Parthia. Thus began another of the queen’s liaisons with noble Romans, a prior having been Julius Caesar (and, according to Plutarch, Pompey Jr. before him). During the course of his stay in Egypt Cleopatra was impregnated, which resulted in twins born to her in 40 B.C. But this care-free period was only a momentary calm in the storm, for trouble was brewing in both the East and the West. Early in 40 B.C. Syria was overrun by the Parthians, seemingly while Antony travelled to Italy to meet Octavian following the Perusine War, in which Octavian defeated the armies of Antony’s wife and brother. The conflict with Octavian was resolved when they signed a pact at Brundisium in October, and Syria was eventually recovered through the efforts of Antony’s commanders from 40 to 38 B.C.[/I] [B] 4 - long sought after[/B] For decades I've been running after a Livia middle bronze. She was the main character in the play, the only one to whom everyone was related, either by blood, poison or politics. Although they're not rare, it's been quite difficult for me to find one that I and my wallet would equaly like [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0038-310.jpg[/IMG] [B] Livia (+ AD 29), Dupondius [/B] Rome mint, AD 22-23 under the reign of Tiberius SALVS AVGVSTA, draped bust of Salus (Livia) right TI CAESAR DIVI AVG F AVG P M TR POT XXIIII, around large S C 13.90 g, 27 mm,. Ref : RCV # 1740 (450), Cohen # 5 (6), RIC I, 47. [B] 3 - beauty[/B] That one hasn't been on my list (I didn't even know it existed before I saw it), and I'm rather straight about attractiveness, but I've been blown away by the beauty of that portrait [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0010-068d.jpg[/IMG] [B] M. Plaetorius M.f. Cestianus. Denarius [/B] Rome mint, c. 69 BC Male head right (Mercury ?) with flowing hair. Behind symbol M·PLAETORI – CEST·EX·S·C Winged caduceus 18 mm, 3,86 gr Ref : RCV #344, RSC Plaetoria # 5, Sydenham # 807, RBW # 1453, Crawford # 405/5 [I]From the E.E. Clain-Stefanelli collection[/I] [B]2 - friendship[/B] I've bought the following for the first time in 2005. In 2008 I sold it to a very good friend who sadly passed away four years ago. I've since stayed in contact with his mother who is, as one can imagine, still devastated by the loss of her sole kid. For the first time this year we had the opportunity to meet in real life, and in loving memory of her son and our friendship she offered to give it back to me. Of course I refused unless she would [I]sell [/I]it back instead of [I]giving [/I]it [ATTACH=full]565360[/ATTACH] [B]Otacilia Severa, Sestertius [/B]struck in Rome on a medallic flan, 244-245 AD MARCIA OTACIL SEVERA AVG, Diademed and draped bust of Otacilia right PVDICITIA AVG. Pudicitia seated left holding sceptre 22.70 gr, [B]35 mm[/B] Ref : Cohen # 55, RC #9169 [B]1 - love[/B] For hours, and for sentimental reasons, I've hesitated about which of the two first coins would be #1, and being quite an optimistic guy I decided life is above death so here is #1. As I told in the related thread ([url]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/between-my-wife-and-i-an-owl-story.280813/[/url]) my wife is kind enough to support my passion for coins and sometimes spend much more than I would dare to just for gifting me with some astounding coin. She, and the coin she bought for me deserves to be #1 any day [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/athena-owl-jpg.516189/[/IMG] [B]ATTICA, Athens. [/B]Circa 454-404 BC. AR Tetradrachm Helmeted head of Athena right, with frontal eye Owl standing right, head facing, olive sprig and crescent behind, all within incuse square. ΑΘΕ in the right field 24mm, 17.08 g, 8h Ref : Kroll # 8; HGC # 4,1597 I wish to all and everyone a merry Xmas and a happy new year Q[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cucumbor's six - 2016 review
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
